Commisioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Transstroy (India) Ltd.,
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court allowed the Department to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn without any costs.
What were the facts?
The Income Tax Department filed an appeal before the High Court against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeal concerned assessment year 2006-07.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the Department's decision to withdraw the appeal based on its new litigation policy concerning monetary stakes.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
^<4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDAR o AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No: 328 OF 2012 Appeal under Section 260 A of Income Tax Act order dated 14-7-2011 in aggrieved by the I.T.A.No.540A/i2ag/2009 (Assessment year 2006- 07) before the Hon’ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench, at Visakhapatnam and Visakhapatnam preferred against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Guntur, dated ITA NO.0117/CIT/GNT/2008-2009 and preferred Income-Tax Officer, Ward-2(2), Guntur in PAN/AABCT4226B/A.Y.2006 - 07/ITO/Ward-2(2), Guntur, Dated; 31.12.2008. 14.09.2009 bearing against the order of the Between: Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajkamal Complex. Lakshmipuram Road, Guntur. Main ...Appellant AND M/s. Transstroy (India) Ltd. Mangalagiri Road, Guntur. D. No. 8-24-42 Tobacco Colony ...Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: SRI B. NARASIMHA SARMA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI M. LAXMINARASIMHAM The Court made the following JUDGMENT:
1 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDAR AND 4 A HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.p. SEKHAR IT T A.No.328 of 2012 P' <. f . :>■ i % . JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice G.Narendar) learned counsel for the Appellant-Department has filed of the circular No.09/2024 in 1. The a memo into Court, including a copy .279/Misc./M-74/2024-lTJ, dated 17.09.2024, whereby, the Appellant-Department has formulated a litigation policy and under it has been resolved not to initiate any Appeals or the monetary stakes involved are less than Rs.2 Crores and hence, he prays leave of the Court to withdraw F.No the said policy Petitions, where the Appeal. Submission is placed on record. 2. dismissed as withdrawn. No Accordingly, the Appeal is 3. costs. the miscellaneous petitions, if any. As a sequel thereto pending in this Appeal shall stand closed. Sd/- P VENKATA RAMANA JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, at Visakhapatnam. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Guntur. 3. The Income-Tax Officer, Ward-2(2), Guntur.
a: ’ % 4. One CC to Sri B. Narasimha Sarma, S.C. for Income Tax [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri M. Laxminarasimham, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Three CD copies. Trt sree
HIGH COURT DATED:18/11/2024 JUDGMENT ITTA.No.328 of 2012 * 28 MAY 2025 W ^ . Current Section . DISMISSING THE ITTA AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vandemataram Projects Private Limited vs. Raipur Development AuthorityChhattisgarh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Surya Prakash Aroma vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 27 Oct 2026
- Mrs. Aqsa Begum vs. Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026