What did the High Court hold?

The Tribunal allowed the department's prayer to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

The Income Tax Department sought to withdraw its appeal before the ITAT. This was based on a new circular issued by the CBDT revising monetary limits for filing appeals. The department argued that the current appeal did not fall within the exceptions to these revised limits.

What were the issues?

Whether the revised monetary limits for filing appeals, as per the CBDT circular, necessitate the withdrawal of an existing appeal before the ITAT.

CIT vs M/S Rockman Industt. Ltd | Punjab & Haryana High Court 2024

216-2 IN

COMMISSIO M/S ROCKMA

CORAM: H

Present: M

M M

* SANJEEV PR

C issued by the Revenue, Ce No.9/2024, th before the IT enhanced and have been tak b o a S 1 2 3 N THE HIGH COURT OF PU CHANDIG I D ONER OF INCOME TAX-II, LUD MAN INDUSTRIES LTD., LUDHIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJ Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Senior Stand for the appellant-Income Tax Dep Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate and Mr. Ishwinder Singh, Advocate f **** RAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) Counsel for the appellant submi e Government of India, Minist entral Board of Direct Taxe he monetary limits for filing of AT, High Court and SLPs befo d the Circular No.5/2024 has bee ken with the purpose to manage l “ 2. As a step towards man been decided by the Board to revise of appeals in Income-tax cases a aforementioned Circular as follows Sl. No. Appeals/SLPs in Income-t 1. Before Income

Tax Tribunal 2. Before High Court 3. Before Supreme Court

NJAB AND HARYANA AT GARH ITA-78-2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.10.2024 DHIANA .…...Appellant (s)

V/s.

IANA ......Respondent(s) NJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA NJAY VASHISTH ding Counsel, partment. for the respondent. its that in terms of the Circular try of Finance, Department of es dated 17.09.2024 bearing f the appeals by the department ore the Supreme Court has been en amended and following steps itigations: nagement of litigation, it has e the monetary limits for filing as stated in Para 4.1 of the s: tax matters Monetary Limit (Tax effect in Rs.) Appellate 60 lakh 2 crore 5 crore

) r f g t n s Suresh Kumar 2024.10.16 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

ITA-78-2011 (O r in 1 5 s m 2. T issuance of SLPs/appeals and also apply and Tribunal, 3. In the case does learned couns 4. A dismissed as w 5. A accordingly.

October 14, 20 Ess Kay 1. Whethe 2. Whethe Page 2 of 2 O&M)

Monetary limits given regard to filing appeal/SLP shall ncluding those relating to TDS/TC 1961 with exceptions as per paras 5/2024 dated 15.03.2024, where th shall be taken on merits, without re monetary limits.”

The modifications have come Circular i.e. 17.09.2024, an to be filed before the Supreme y to the appeals pending before which have been directed to be n view of aforesaid Circular N s not fall within the exception sel prays for withdrawal of the pr Accordingly, we allow the pray withdrawn. All pending applications also

(SANJ 024 r speaking/reasoned?

Y r reportable?

Y in paragraph 2 above with l be applicable to all cases CS under the Income-tax Act, s 3.1 and 3.2 of Circular No he decision to appeal/file SLP egard to the tax effect and the into effect from the date of nd therefore shall apply to Court, High Court and Tribunal the Supreme Court, High Court withdrawn. No.09/2024 dated 17.09.2024, as clause of Circular No.5/2024, resent appeal. yer as above, and the appeal is stand dismissed as withdrawn EEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE

(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No

f o l t s , s n Suresh Kumar 2024.10.16 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II LUDHIANA vs. M/S ROCKMAN INDUSTT. LTD.

What did the High Court hold?

What were the facts?

What were the issues?

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Recent GST High Court judgments