INFOTECH ENTERPRISES LIMITED vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

PDF · subscribers
ITTA/205/2010HC TelanganaHBHC01039685201002 November 2021Bench: UJJAL BHUYAN,CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA3 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court granted the appellant liberty to withdraw the appeal. This withdrawal was to enable the appellant to pursue their remedy under the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.

What were the facts?

The appellant, Infotech Enterprises Limited, had filed an appeal before the High Court. The appellant informed the court that they had opted for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme. Consequently, they requested to withdraw the appeal.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the appellant could withdraw their appeal in light of opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260-A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

HIGH COURT FOR THE ST AT HYDECfJiDOF TELANGANA '' i%';l3t sifi S xR Sirgfi i"oJfi y,. * PRESENT THE HoNouRaeLe sir JUsircE uJJAL BHUyAN rHE HoNouRABLE DR. rrtYll. .HTLLAKUR .,MALATHA TAX lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, against the order of the Income Tax Appeilate Tribunar, Hyderabad Bench ,A, Hyderabad in rrA No.492lH/03 for assessment year 1999-2000 dated 2grosr2oog preferred against the Order of the lncome Tax (Appeals)-il1, Hyderabad in tTA No.609/DCtT _2(4yCtT (A)_ lll/02-03 daled 1711212002 preferred against the order of the Deputy commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle -2(4) Hyderabad in pAN/GtR No.t.79 dated 13tO3l2OO2. INCOM E TRIBU NAL APPEAL NO : 205 OF 2010 Between: lnfotech Enterl:rises Limited,42, Nagarjuna Hills, panjagutta, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Director, Smt B.Sucharitha AND ...APPELLANT Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Central Circle-S, Ayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad-500001 . ...RESPONDENT For the Appellant : SRI S.CHAKRAPANI, LEARNED cOUNSEL FOR REPRESENTING FOR SRI CHALLA GUNARANJAN For the Respondent : SMT MAMATHA SENIOR STANDING COUNSEL The Court delivered the following: JUDGIVENT

HON()URABLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYA\ AND HONOIIRABLE DR.JUSTICB CHILLAKUR SUMAI,ATHA I.T.T.A No.205 OF 2010 JIJDGMENT I tPe r Hon'ble Sri.lustice ujjal Bhuyan) Heard Mr. S.Chakrapani, leamed counsel representing Mr.Challa Gunaranjan, learned counsel for the appellant and Mrs.Mamatha. lear'ned Senior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Depafiment fol the respor-rdent. 2. Learnecl counsel for the appellant subrnits that appellant has opted for settlement under Vivad Se Vishwas scheme. Therefbre, in terms of the scheme, he is required to withdraw the appeal. [{ence, the player for withdrawal of the appeal. 3. We granr liberty to the appellant to withdraw the appeal so as to pursue the rem{ldy under the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme. 4. The appi:al is, accordingly, disposed of. 5. No costs. Sd/-K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGIS //TRUE COPY' { SECTION OFFICER The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A' Hyderabad The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-lll, Hyderabad. The Deputy Commrssioner of lncome Tax, Circle-2(4), Hyderabad. One CC to Sri Challa Gunaranjan, Advocate (OPUC) One CC to Smt l\4amatha, Senior Standing Counsel (OPUC) Two CD Copies One Spare Copy I To 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Kj \ AIY

HIGH COURT DATED:0211112021 JUDGMENT ITTA.No.205 ol 2010 DISPOSING OF THE ITTA AS WITHDRAWAL WITHOUT COSTS. :Jc q) !.i .1 \ .1$ tnritit \ C, '\'),4Nt" ;{fr-ry

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →