The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) vs. The Hyderabad Cricket Association
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court noted that the tax liability was below the enhanced monetary limit. Therefore, in light of the new circular, the appeal filed by the Department was disposed of.
What were the facts?
The Department filed an appeal before the High Court. The tax liability in the present case was less than Rs. 2 crores. A new circular dated 17.09.2024 enhanced the monetary limit for filing appeals before the High Court to Rs. 2 crores.
What were the issues?
Whether the Department's appeal should be withdrawn or disposed of based on the revised monetary limits for filing appeals before the High Court as per the new circular.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
2025:CGHC:32908-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR TAXC No. 50 of 2022 1 - Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 1 (1), Mahima Commercial Complex, Vyapar Vihar, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Appellant versus 1 - M/s South Eastern Coalfileds Limited Seepat , Road, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent For Appellant : Mr. Amit Chaudhari and Mr. Vijay Chawla, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anand Dadariya, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal and Hon’ble Shri Sachin Singh Rajput, JJ Judgment on Board 15/07/2025 Sanjay K. Agrawal, J. 1. When the case is taken for hearing, learned counsel for the Appellant submits that the Government of India, Ministry of Finance has issued a new circular dated 17.09.2024 in which, monetary limits for filing Income Tax Appeals by the Department before the High Court has been enhanced to Rs.2 crores whereas, in the present case, the tax PAWAN KUMAR Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR Date: 2025.07.17 10:39:16 +0530
2 liability of the assessee is less than Rs.2 Crores, therefore, in the light of the aforesaid circular dated 17.09.2024, the present Appeal may be disposed of finally. 2. The said prayer appears to be fair and reasonable. 3. For ready reference, relevant paragraphs of the circular dated 17.09.2024 are quoted below:- “1. Reference is invited to Circular No 5/2024 (F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt) dated15.03.2024 of Central Board of Direct Taxes (the 'Board') vide which monetary limits for filing of income tax Appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLP/Appeals before Supreme Court have been specified. Further, exceptions to the monetary limits were also specified vide paras 3.1 and 3.2 of the said Circular. 2. As a step towards management of litigation, it has been decided by the Board to revise the monetary limits for filing of Appeals in Income-tax cases as stated in Para 4.1 of the aforementioned Circular as follows:- S.No. Appeals/SLPs in income- tax matters Monetary Limit (Tax effect in Rs.) 1. Before
Income
Tax Appellalte Tribunal 60 lacs 2. Before High Court 2 crores 3. Before Supreme Court 5 crores 3. Monetary limits given in paragraph-2 above with regard to filing Appeal/SLP shall be applicable to all cases including those relating to TDS/TCS under the Income- Tax Act, 1961 with exceptions as per paras 3.1 and 3.2 of Circular No 5/2024 dated 15.03.2024, where the decision to Appeal/file SLP shall be taken on merits, without regard to the tax effect and the monetary limits.
3 4. It is clarified that an Appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of Appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case. The officers concerned shall keep in mind the overall objective of reducing unnecessary litigation and providing certainty to taxpayers on their Income-tax assessments while taking a decision regarding filing an Appeal. 5. The modifications shall come into effect from the date of issue of this Circular. This Circular will apply to SLPs/Appeals to be filed henceforth in SC/HCs/Tribunal. It shall also apply to the SLPs/ Appeals pending before Supreme Courts/High Courts/Tribunal, which may accordingly be withdrawn. 6. The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned. 7. This issues under section 268A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 8. Hindi version will follow.” 4. In view of the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the Appellant where monetary limit (tax liability) in the present case is less than Rs.2 Crores and in the light of aforesaid circular (Para-5) dated 17.09.2024, the instant Tax Case stands disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge Judge Pawan
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026