RAIN COMMODITIES LTD., vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court noted the submission by the appellant's counsel that the cause in the appeal had become infructuous. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the appeal.
What were the facts?
The appellant, Rain Commodities Limited, filed an appeal before the High Court against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeal was filed under Section 260(A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal had become infructuous, leading to its dismissal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
13447 | IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 58 OF 2011 Appeal filed under Section 260(A) of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 24-12-2010 passed in lTA.No. 673/Hydl2O1O lor the assessment year 20O4-2OO5 on the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad, Bench 'B' Hyderabad preferred against the Order dated O8-12-2OO passed in PAN/GlR No. i AABCR2276I</R-269 on the file of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle- 3(1), Hyderabad. Between: Rain Commodities Limited, Hyderabad. Plot No. 34, Rain Centre, Srinagar Colony, ...APPELLANT AND Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle 3(1), Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT l.A. NO: 1 OF 20J1(ITTA!4P. NO: 166 OF 2011) Petitron under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order granting stay of recovery of disputed taxes for the assessment year 2OO4-20O5 during the pendency of the present appeal filed against the order daled 24-12-2010 passed by the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad in ITA No. 673/Hyd/2010. Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Ch. Pushyam Kiran Counsel for the Respondents: Sri B. Narasimha Sarma The Court delivered the following JUDGMENT:
:...-"--T-7 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA INCOME TA)( TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.58 OF 2011 JUDGMENT'. @er Hon,bte sn Justk.(, p.s.nr KoshLtj Today, when the marter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that the cause in the instant appeal has become infructuous. 2. Recording the above made submission, this appeal stands dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO O PolNr REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \ ,l - - TO, \ I ISECTION OFFICER \ 1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad, BencY 'B' Hyderabad 2. The Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle-3(1), Hyderabad. 3. One CC to Sri Ch. Pushyam Kiran, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri B. Narasimha Sarma, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies VTYDL
HIGH COURT DATED: 1010212025 JUDGMENT ITTA.No.58 of 2011 DISMISSING THE ITTA AS INFRUCTUOUS \aE STArc 1 ( cl L) 2 0 l\Pn 2025 2 c' * t ^5 t' aa o I o t(
More judgments on Section 260(A)
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026