Facts
The assessee filed appeals against an ex-parte order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Central (NFAC/CIT(A)) dated 24.06.2024 for A.Y. 2017-18. The CIT(A) rejected the appeal stating the assessee was not interested as there was no response to hearing notices, without mentioning the date of service of such notices. The assessee contended this was a violation of principles of natural justice.
Held
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) failed to provide adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee by not ensuring proper service of notice under Section 250 of the Act. Citing a Supreme Court judgment, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of opportunity of being heard. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the impugned ex-parte order and remanded the matter back to the CIT(A)/NFAC for fresh adjudication on merits, ensuring proper opportunity is given to the assessee.
Key Issues
Whether the ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A) without ensuring proper service of hearing notices and adequate opportunity to the assessee violated principles of natural justice.
Sections Cited
Section 250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH (Virtual
Before: SHRI LALIET KUMAR, HONBLE & DR. MITHA LAL MEENA, HONBLE
These Appeals by the assessee are filed in duplicate against the order of National Faceless Appeal Central, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “NFAC/CIT(A)"