ANSA J & K INDUSTRIAL PREMISES CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD,MUMBAI vs. I.T.O WARD 26(1)(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the Ld. CIT(A) is required to pass a reasoned and speaking order on the grounds raised by the assessee, even in the absence of submissions. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and restored the matter to him for a fresh decision.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was dismissed by the Ld. CIT(A) ex-parte without deciding the issue on merit, despite the Ld. CIT(A) issuing several notices which were not complied with by the assessee. The assessee argued that the appeal should be set aside and decided afresh.
What were the issues?
Whether the Ld. CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal ex-parte without deciding the merits, and if the matter should be remanded for a reasoned order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “K (SMC
Before: SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT & MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL
This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against order dated 02.07.2024 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) – National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [in short ‘the Ld. CIT(A)’] for assessment year 2017-18, raising following grounds:
On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the proceedings initiated us 147 of the act is invalid and bad in law.
On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the notice issued us 148 of the act is invalid and bad in law. notice issued us 148 of the act is invalid and bad in law.
On the facts and 3. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the in the circumstances of the case and in law, the assessment order passed u/s 147 r.w.S. 144B of the act is invalid assessment order passed u/s 147 r.w.S. 144B of the act is invalid assessment order passed u/s 147 r.w.S. 144B of the act is invalid and bad in law. and bad in law.
4. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the 4. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the 4. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned C.I.T. (A) erred in dismissing the appeal. learned C.I.T. (A) erred in dismissing the appeal. 5. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the n the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the n the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned C.I.T. (A) erred in dismissing the appeal and that too learned C.I.T. (A) erred in dismissing the appeal and that too learned C.I.T. (A) erred in dismissing the appeal and that too without even appreciating the facts and circumstances of the case without even appreciating the facts and circumstances of the case without even appreciating the facts and circumstances of the case fully and properly. fully and properly. 6. On the facts and in the circumstances o 6. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the f the case and in law, the learned C.I.T. (A) erred in dismissing the appeal and that with out learned C.I.T. (A) erred in dismissing the appeal and that with out learned C.I.T. (A) erred in dismissing the appeal and that with out dealing with the merits of the case. dealing with the merits of the case. 2. At the outset, the Ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that At the outset, the Ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that At the outset, the Ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that this appeal has been decided by the Ld. CIT(A) this appeal has been decided by the Ld. CIT(A) ex ex-parte qua the assessee without deciding the issue on merit and therefore, this assessee without deciding the issue on merit and therefore, this assessee without deciding the issue on merit and therefore, this appeal might be set aside for deciding afresh. appeal might be set aside for deciding afresh.
3. We have heard rival submission of the parties and perused the We have heard rival submission of the parties and perused the We have heard rival submission of the parties and perused the relevant material on record. We find that the Ld. CIT(A) issued relevant material on record. We find that the Ld. CIT(A) issued relevant material on record. We find that the Ld. CIT(A) issued various notices for hearing however, same were not complied by the hearing however, same were not complied by the hearing however, same were not complied by the assessee. The Ld. CIT(A) thereafter dismissed the appeal in default assessee. The Ld. CIT(A) thereafter dismissed the appeal in default assessee. The Ld. CIT(A) thereafter dismissed the appeal in default without considering the issue on merit. In our opinion, under the without considering the issue on merit. In our opinion, under the without considering the issue on merit. In our opinion, under the provisions of section 250(6) of the Act, the Ld. CIT(A) is required to provisions of section 250(6) of the Act, the Ld. CIT(A) is requ provisions of section 250(6) of the Act, the Ld. CIT(A) is requ pass a reasoned and speaking order on the grounds raised by the pass a reasoned and speaking order on the grounds raised by the pass a reasoned and speaking order on the grounds raised by the assessee even in absence of any submission on behalf of the assessee even in absence of any submission on behalf of assessee even in absence of any submission on behalf of assessee. Therefore, we feel it appropriate to set aside the order of assessee. Therefore, we feel it appropriate to set aside the orde assessee. Therefore, we feel it appropriate to set aside the orde the Ld. CIT(A) and restore the Ld. CIT(A) and restore the matter back to him for the matter back to him for deciding afresh and pass a reasoned and speaking order on the grounds a reasoned and speaking order on the grounds a reasoned and speaking order on the grounds raised by the assessee. The grounds of appeal of the assessee are raised by the assessee. The grounds of appeal of the assessee are raised by the assessee. The grounds of appeal of the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes. accordingly allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. urposes.
Order pronounced in the open Court on nounced in the open Court on 22/10/2024. /10/2024.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026