THE PR., COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3 vs. M/S NIKE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court disposed of the appeal based on the assessee's submission that the dispute was settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The court noted that the Revenue could seek revival if the assertion was untrue.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal challenging an ITAT order for AY 2007-08. The assessee, Nike India Private Limited, has resolved the dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal filed by the Revenue should be dismissed when the assessee has settled the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 91(6) of the Finance Act, 2024
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:11036-DB ITA No. 638 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 638 OF 2023 BETWEEN:
THE PR., COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3, KORMANGALA, BANGALORE.
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 5(1)(1), BANGALORE. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. E.I. SANMATHI, ADVOCATE) AND:
M/S. NIKE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, NO.701, THE MILLENIA, TOWER-B, MURPHY ROAD, ULSOOR, BANGALORE-560 008. PAN NO.AABCN9612K …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR, ADVOCATE)
THIS ITA / INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 14/10/2020 PASSED IN IT(TP)A NO. 356/BANG/2017, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08. PRAYING TO 1 DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW
Digitally signed by SHAKAMBARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:11036-DB ITA No. 638 of 2023
AND/OR SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE HON'BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT AND SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 14/10/2020 PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 'B' BENCH, BANGALORE, AS SOUGHT FOR, IN THE RESPONDENT- ASSESSEE'S CASE, IN APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN IT(TP)A NO. 356/BANG/2017 FOR A.Y. 2007-08 (ANNEXURE A) AND GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF AS DEEMED FIT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT)
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- assessee has filed a memo dated 28.02.2025, which reads as under: "The Advocate for the Respondent most humbly submits as that the above appeal was filed by the Appellants challenging the order dated 14.10.2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in IT
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:11036-DB ITA No. 638 of 2023
(TP)A No.356/Bang/2017 for the assessment year 2007-08.
It is submitted that the Respondent has resolved the dispute under the provisions of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 ("the Scheme") and in this regard, the Respondent has filed the relevant declaration in Form-1. Pursuant to the declaration filed by the Respondent, the Income-tax Department has issued Form-2 dated 15.02.2025. A true copy of the Form-2 dated 15.02.2025 is produced herewith and marked as Annexure-A.
In terms of the provisions of Section 91(6) of the Finance Act, 2024, once the dispute is settled under the Scheme, the Revenue is required to withdraw the appeal filed by it.
In view of the above, it is submitted that the above appeal is liable to be dismissed.
Wherefore, it is most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to take the memo together with the above annexure on record and dispose of the appeal, in the interests of justice and equity".
- 4 -
NC: 2025:KHC:11036-DB ITA No. 638 of 2023
In view of the memo, the appeal is disposed off. If assertion made through the memo is not true, it is open for the appellant/revenue to seek revival of this appeal. Ordered accordingly.
Sd/- (KRISHNA S DIXIT) JUDGE
Sd/- (RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR) JUDGE
DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3 CT:SNN
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026