DCIT CC -15, NEW DELHI vs. JFC FINANCE (INDIA) LIMITED, NEW DELHI

Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused.

Delay of 27 days in filing of the instant appeal is condoned in the larger interest of justice in light of Collector Land Acquisition vs. Mst. Katiji & Ors (1987) 167 ITR 471 (SC). JFC Finance (India) Ltd. 2 4. It transpires during the course of hearing that the learned CIT(A) herein has quashed section 153C r.w.s. 143(3) assessment herein; as not sustainable in law, for the precise reason that the impugned assessment year fall beyond the statutory time period of ten assessment years as on the date of search, which is to be calculated as on the date of necessary satisfaction to be recorded by the learned Assessing Officer under 1st proviso to section 153C(1) of the Act. We wish to make it clear that the learned departmental authorities had carried out the search in question on 18.10.2019 which inter alia followed the searched party’s Assessing Officer’s section 153C satisfaction on 24.06.2022; who handed over the seized material on the very date to the juri ictional assessing authority. And that this latter Assessing Officer recorded his satisfaction on 13.10.2023. The Revenue could hardly dispute in this factual backdrop that going by the above date of handing over of the seized material to the assessee’s Assessing Officer is to be treated as the date of search itself u/s 153C(1) 1st proviso. And that the relevant ten assessment years ought to be counted u/s 153A(1) Explanation-I as i.e. “from the end of the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which the search conducted or a requisition is made” does not cover the assessment year 2012-13 herein. JFC Finance (India) Ltd. 3 5. Learned CIT-DR vehemently reiterates the Revenue’s stand that the CIT(A) herein has erred in law and on facts in quashing the impugned assessment as falling beyond the statutory framework of ten assessment years; to be counted from the end of the assessment year as on the date of recording of satisfaction.

We find no merit in the Revenue’s relevant submissions. This is for the precise reason that hon’ble juri ictional high court recent landmark decision in PCIT vs. Ojjus Medicare Pvt. Ltd. (2024) 465 ITR 101 (Del.); as followed in the CIT(A) lower appellate discussion, has already settled both these issues in the assessee’s favour and against the department thereby holding that going by section 153A(1) Explanation-I as applicable in an assessment to be framed u/s 153C of the Act, has to count ten years “from the end of the assessment year relevant to the previous year in the search is conducted...........”. We thus find merit in the assessee’s vehement submissions supporting the learned CIT(A) impugned lower appellate discussion quashing the assessment in very terms. The Revenue fails in it’s substantive ground raised in the appeal therefore.

All other pleadings on merits herein stand rendered academic. JFC Finance (India) Ltd. 4 8. This Revenue’s appeal is dismissed in above terms. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 30/12/2025. (Manish Agarwal) (Satbeer Singh Godara) Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated: 30/12/2025 *Subodh Kumar, Sr. PS*