Facts
The assessee filed an appeal against an order dated 11/06/2024 passed by NFAC Delhi for assessment years 2015-16. The appeal raised grounds regarding additions made under Section 68 for unexplained credits and a deduction claimed under Chapter VI-A. The assessee also argued that the re-opening of assessment was bad in law.
Held
The assessee's authorized representative submitted that the present appeal was inadvertently filed, as two other appeals against the same impugned order were already filed, one of which was remanded by the Tribunal for de novo consideration. Consequently, the present appeal was deemed infructuous.
Key Issues
Whether the addition made under Section 68 for unexplained credits and deduction claimed under Chapter VI-A were justified, and whether the re-opening of assessment was legally valid.
Sections Cited
68, Chapter VI-A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai “D” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SMT. BEENA PILLAI & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR
Present for: Assessee by : Ms. Kavita Nabera Revenue by : Shri.. R. R. Makwana, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing : 13.11.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 22.11.2024 O R D E R Per Beena Pillai, JM: Present appeals is filed by the assessee against order dated 11/06/2024 passed by NFAC Delhi for assessment years 2015- 16 on following grounds of appeal: “Ground No. 1: Addition made u/s 68 on account of Unexplained Credits