SHRI DALJEET SINGH,JAMMU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2 (1), JAMMU
Facts
The assessee's assessment for AY 2017-18 resulted in an ex-parte assessment under Section 144 of the Income Tax Act by the AO, with subsequent confirmation of additions amounting to Rs. 12,17,896/- by the CIT(A). The assessee contended that they were unable to respond to assessment notices due to strict curfew, internet shutdown, and general turmoil in Jammu & Kashmir following the abrogation of Article 370, which were circumstances beyond their control.
Held
The Tribunal observed that the assessee was denied an adequate opportunity of being heard by both the AO and CIT(A) due to the extraordinary circumstances in Jammu & Kashmir. Emphasizing the principles of natural justice, the Tribunal remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision on merits after providing the assessee with a proper opportunity to present their case and documents.
Key Issues
Whether an ex-parte assessment and subsequent confirmation of additions are valid when the assessee claims denial of natural justice due to inability to respond to notices arising from widespread turmoil and communication blockade following the abrogation of Article 370 in Jammu & Kashmir.
Sections Cited
143(2), 144, 44AD
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आदेश/Order आदेश आदेश आदेश
Per Krinwant Sahay, AM: Appeal in this case has been filed by the Assessee against the order dated 14.12.2023passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC) for A.Y. 2017-18.
42-Asr-2024 Daljeet Singh, Phalwal, J&K 2
Grounds of appeal are as under:-
That the order of the Assessing Officer as well as the order of Learned CIT(A) are both against the facts of the case and are untenable under the law.
That the worthy CIT(A) has not appreciated the facts of the case and merely relied on order of the AO and without applying his mind and without any rhyme & reason, the Ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the addition of Rs. 12,17,896/- made by the AO. As such the order of Ld CIT(A) is liable to be cancelled and the addition made may be deleted.
That the AO while completing the assessment, has not issued notice u/s 143(2)as admittedly the return in this case was duly filed on 25/09/2019 therein showing the income of Rs.2,98,860/-.
4 That the AO has grossly erred in dividing the addition into two parts and upto 08/11/2016 he has applied a rate of 8% on the total receipts and as such the addition was made to the tune of Rs. 1,95,896.
5 That again the AO has made the addition of Rs. 10,22,000/- on account of deposit of currency during 09/11/2016 to 30/12/2016.
That the CIT(A) has also grossly erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 12,17,896/-made by the AO. As such the addition made by the AO and confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) may be deleted.
42-Asr-2024 Daljeet Singh, Phalwal, J&K 3
That the authorities below did not appreciate that the assessee was carrying on retail business of readymade garments under the name & style of 'Lucky Di Hatti' and the return was tiled therein declaring an income of Rs.2,98,856/- by applying the provisions of section 44AD. The addition made is unjustified and uncalled for and the same may be deleted. Alternatively, the order is liable to be cancelled as the Ld. CIT(A) has not decided the issue on merits. Alternatively the addition made is very high and excessive.
That any other ground of appeal which may be argued at the time of hearing of the appeal.
During the proceedings before us, ld. Counsel for the Assessee
submitted that the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer in
this case is an ex-parte order u/s 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in
short 'the Act'). The ld. counsel has also filed written submission on this
issue which is as under:-
“It is further relevant to point out that the AO has not given any opportunity of being heard and no notices were received in time because of turmoil on 05/08/2019 onwards. We were under strict curfew and also due to blockade of internet and mobile services. It is worth relevant to point out that Union Home Minister on 05/08/2019 took a decision to
42-Asr-2024 Daljeet Singh, Phalwal, J&K 4
abrogate Article 370 from Jammu & Kashmir. On account of introduction of this Bill, there has been complete violence in Kashmir and there was internet shut down for 145 days in Kashmir. Even there has been blackout for 145 days after the Centre Govt, abrogated Article 370 of the constitution. As such, it was not possible to comply with the notices as the circumstances were beyond the control of the assessee. Thus, the CIT(A) confirmed the addition without appreciating the facts of this case and without application of mind inspite of the fact that the books of accounts were regularly maintained and return of income was filed.
The Assessment order was passed u/s 144 vide order dated 02/12/2019. Thus, it is clear that the life was abnormal in those days. The AO should have taken into consideration all the facts while passing the order.
The ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of the Assessee and he has
confirmed the addition made by the Assessing Officer in by passing ex-
parte order.
The ld. DR relied on the order of the ld. CIT(A).
42-Asr-2024 Daljeet Singh, Phalwal, J&K 5
We have considered the findings given by the Assessing Officer in
his ex-parte assessment order and the findings given by the ld. CIT(A) in
appellate order. We have also considered the written submissions filed by
the Counsel of the Assessee during the proceedings before us. We find
that as per the Counsel of the Assessee, the Assessee could not get any
notice because of the strict curfew in Kashmir Valley of Jammu
&Kashmir, because of the abrogation of Article 370, and the assessment
pertains to that period only. Therefore, we are of the considered view that
the Assessee could not get any opportunity to bring his side of story and
file the relevant documents before the Assessing Officer during the
assessment proceedings. We also find that the ld. CIT(A) has not
considered the facts that the Assessee could not get notice because of the
curfew imposed in the valley at that point of time and the CIT(A) has
simply confirmed the addition made by the Assessing Officer in his ex-
parte order. Therefore, keeping in view the element of natural justice to
the Assessee, we are of this considered view that the matter should be
remanded back to the file of the Assessing Officer to be decided afresh on
merit, in accordance with law, on affording due and adequate
opportunity of hearing to the Assessee. The Assessee, no doubt, shall
cooperate in the fresh proceedings before the A.O. All pleas available
42-Asr-2024 Daljeet Singh, Phalwal, J&K 6 under the law shall remain so available to the assessee. Ordered accordingly. 7. In the result, appeal is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 15.01.2025
Sd/- Sd/- ( UDAYAN DAS GUPTA ) ( KRINWANT SAHAY) Judicial Member Accountant Member “आर आर.केकेकेके.” आर आर आदेशक��ितिल*पअ+े*षत आदेशक��ितिल*पअ+े*षत/ Copy of the order forwarded to : आदेशक��ितिल*पअ+े*षत आदेशक��ितिल*पअ+े*षत 1. अपीलाथ� अपीलाथ� अपीलाथ�/ The Appellant अपीलाथ� 2. ��यथ� ��यथ� ��यथ�/ The Respondent ��यथ� 3. आयकरआयु, आयकरआयु, आयकरआयु,/ CIT आयकरआयु, 4. *वभागीय�ितिनिध *वभागीय�ितिनिध *वभागीय�ितिनिध, आयकरअपीलीयआिधकरण *वभागीय�ितिनिध आयकरअपीलीयआिधकरण आयकरअपीलीयआिधकरण, च0ड#गढ़ आयकरअपीलीयआिधकरण च0ड#गढ़ च0ड#गढ़/ DR, ITAT, च0ड#गढ़ CHANDIGARH 5. गाड�फाईल गाड�फाईल गाड�फाईल/ Guard File गाड�फाईल आदेशानुसार/ By order, आदेशानुसार आदेशानुसार आदेशानुसार सहायकपंजीकार/ Assistant Registrar
