TATTWAJNANA VIDYAPEETH,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (E)-2(1), MUMBAI

ITA 4798/MUM/2024Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 November 2024AY 2010-11Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, HON'BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR, HON'BLE (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that income exempt under Section 10 cannot be brought to tax under Section 11, following the decision of the Jurisdictional High Court. The matter was remanded to the AO for verifying the claim regarding tax deducted at source.

What were the facts?

The assessee challenged reassessment proceedings and the addition of exempt income (dividend and agricultural income) to its total income. The assessee argued that income exempt under Section 10 cannot be subjected to Section 11.

What were the issues?

Whether income exempt under Section 10 is taxable under Section 11, and whether reassessment proceedings were validly initiated.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 10,Section 11,Section 147

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “E” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, HON’BLE & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR, HON’BLE

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh Shah, A/R
Hearing: 19/11/2024Pronounced: 27/11/2024

Heard together (3 matters)

I.T.A. No.4800/Mum/2024
I.T.A. No. 4798/Mum/2024
I.T.A. No. 4799/Mum/2024

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

PER SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM: The present appeals by theassesseeare preferred against the separate orders passed by the NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter ‘the ld. CIT(A)’]dated 30/07/2024, 29/07/2024 & 01/08/2024pertaining to AYs2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 respectively.

2.

As the issues arising in all these appeals are identical, they were heard together and are disposed off by way of this common order.

3.

At the concession of the representatives, we have heard the appeal for AY 2009-10 and are conside

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 10

All 591 judgments and leading authorities on Section 10 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →