RAJPARIS CIVIL CONSTRUCTIONS LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal followed its previous order for the assessment year 2010-11 in the assessee's own case. The matter was remitted back to the Assessing Officer to verify if the built-up area of each flat was less than 1500 sq.ft.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction under Section 80-IB(10) of the Income-tax Act. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) had passed orders on this claim. The assessee appealed to the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is eligible for deduction under Section 80-IB(10) based on the built-up area of the flats.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN & SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY
आदेश /O R D E R
PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal of the assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -3, Chennai, dated 31.01.2017 and pertains to assessment year 2011-12.
The only issue arises for consideration is deduction claimed by the assessee under Section 80-IB(10) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act').
We heard Shri A. Satyaseelan, the Ld.counsel for the assessee and Ms. S. Vijayaprabha, the Ld. Departmental Representative. We find that this Tribunal in the assessee's own case for assessment year 2010-11, examined the issue and remitted back the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer to verify whether the built up area of each flat is less than 1500 sq.ft.
Therefore, by following the order of this Tribunal for the assessment year 2010-11 in the assessee's own case, the orders of both the authorities below are set aside and the issue is remitted back to the file of the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer shall re- examine the matter and bring on record whether the built up area of each flat is less than 1500 sq.ft. and thereafter decide the issue afresh in the light of the observation made by this Tribunal in the assessee's own case for assessment year 2010-11, after giving a reasonable opportunity to the assessee.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 80-IB(10)
- D R Corporation, Surat vs ACIT, Circle 1(2), SuratITA 265/SRT/2024[2013-14]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- D R Associates, Surat vs ACIT, Circle 1(2), SuratITA 264/SRT/2024[2013-14]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Atul Projects India Private Limited, MumbaiITA 5219/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- DCIT-12(2)(2), Mumbai vs M/S.Guruashish Construction Private…ITA 2512/MUM/2018[2012-13]Status: Disposed10 Aug 2026AY 2012-13
- P V Hemalatha, Kozhikode vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), KozhikodeITA 961/COCH/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Jun 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026