SRI SRI SITARAMJI BHAWAN (ESTATE),KOLKATA vs. CIT(E), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee's representative had not withdrawn the registration application. Therefore, the assessee deserved another opportunity to have its application adjudicated on merit.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a trust established in 1966, applied for registration under Section 12AA. The CIT(E) rejected the application, stating the assessee had agreed to withdraw it due to non-compliance. However, the assessee's representative denied withdrawing the application.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) was correct in rejecting the registration application as withdrawn without proper evidence of withdrawal. The genuineness of the assessee's activities was also implicitly an issue.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH “B” KOLKATA
Before: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri, M. Balaganesh
Shri V.N. Purohit, FCA अपीलाथ� क� ओर से/By Appellant Shri S. Dasgupta, Addl. CIT-DR ��यथ� क� ओर से/By Respondent 23-07-2018 सुनवाई क� तार�ख/Date of Hearing 31-07-2018 घोषणा क� तार�ख/Date of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R PER S.S.Godara, Judicial Member:- This assessee’s appeal arises against Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Kolkata’s order dated 17.10.2017 involving proceedings 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short ‘the Act’. Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
This assessee came into existence as a trust on 21.08.1966 vide its corresponding trust deed. It sought for section 12AA registration vide application submitted Form 10A dated 19.04.2017. This followed that the relevant enquiries at the CIT(E)’s end. The assessee filed all details of its donation received which were treated as corpus donation, balance-sheet along with income and expenditure account as well as the other documents sought therein. Learned CIT(E) lastly concluded in his order under challenge Sri Sri Sitaramji Bhawan (Estate) Vs. CIT(E), Kolkata Page 2 that the assessee had agreed for withdrawing its registration application on account of non compliance of the earlier directions seeking to treat its activities to be non genuine. He has therefore rejected assessee’s registration application in limine as withdrawn. This leaves the assessee agreed.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mrs. Aqsa Begum vs. Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026