SAINATH SAKHARAM TARE,THANE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, THANE, THANE

PDF
ITA 3681/MUM/2024Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 December 2024AY 2014-15Bench: SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY (Judicial Member), SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

A search and seizure action was conducted on the Antariksh Group, which engaged the assessee for contractual services. During the search, documents related to the assessee were seized, leading the Assessing Officer (AO) to assess the assessee's income under section 153A r.w.s. 153C of the Income Tax Act. The AO questioned cash receipts and later initiated penalty proceedings under section 271 DA for contravention of section 269 ST.

Held

The Tribunal noted that while the assessee may not have fully explained its case before the CIT(A), the fact remained that the assessee was not heard before the impugned order was passed. Therefore, the Tribunal decided to remand the matter back to the CIT(A).

Key Issues

Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an ex-parte order without granting sufficient opportunity of hearing to the assessee, and whether the action of the AO in assessing income and levying penalty was valid.

Sections Cited

153A, 153C, 143(3), 271 DA, 269 ST, 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “G”, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY & SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY

For Appellant: Shri Dr. Kishor Dhule, CIT D.R.& Smt. Sujatha

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “G”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 3681/M/2024 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Sainath Sakharam Tara Assistant Commissioner Survey No. 84-10/11, of Income Tax, Central Kalyan Padgha Road, Circle – 2, Thane Sape Village, Bhiwandi, Ashar IT Park, 6th Floor, Dist. Thane – 421302. Vs. Road No. 16z, Wagle PAN: AERPT8712M Industrial Estate, Thane – 400604. (Appellant) (Respondent)

Present for : : Shri Gaurav Kabra Assessee by : Shri Dr. Kishor Dhule, CIT D.R.& Smt. Sujatha Revenue by P. Iyangar – Sr. AR.

Date of Hearing : 05. 09 .2024 Date of Pronouncement : 02 .12 . 2024

O R D E R Per : Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Accountant Member: 1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant against the Order of the Ld. CIT (Appeals) passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act [the ‘Act’ in short] vide DIN & Order No. ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1065032178(1) Dated 21/05/2024 for the Assessment Year 2014-15.

Sd/- Sd/- NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai, Dated: 02.12.2024. Snehal C. Ayare, Stenographer Copy to:The Appellant The Respondent The CIT, Concerned, Mumbai The DR Concerned Bench //True Copy// By Order

Dy/Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, Mumbai.

SAINATH SAKHARAM TARE,THANE vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, THANE, THANE | BharatTax