LAKSHMI JAIN,CHENNAI vs ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 11(5), CHENNAI

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ (SMC

Before: SHRI ABRAHAM P. GEORGE & SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY]

For Respondent: Shri. B.Sagadevan, IRS, JCIT

आदेश / O R D E R PER ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER When the appeal was called up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of assessee. Despite issue of notice to the address given in Form No.36, no authorized person had appeared on behalf of the assessee. In the circumstances, we are of the opinion that the

ITA No.2750 /2017 :- 2 -: assessee is not interested in prosecuting the case. Following the decision of the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in the case of CIT v. Multiplan (India) Ltd. (38 ITD 320) (Del), we dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee, for non-prosecution.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. 2.

Order pronounced in the open court at the time of hearing on Tuesday, the 10th April, 2018 at Chennai.

LAKSHMI JAIN,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 11(5), CHENNAI