MARG PROJECTS & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE IV(1), CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(Appeals) has coterminous powers with the Assessing Officer and is expected to decide the appeal on merit, irrespective of the assessee's appearance. Dismissing the appeal for non-appearance is not permissible.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(Appeals) was dismissed for non-prosecution without considering the merits. The assessee had a one-day delay in filing the appeal before the ITAT, which was condoned.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Appeals) can dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution without adjudicating on merits, and if the matter should be remanded for fresh consideration.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN & SHRI ABRAHAM P. GEORGE
आदेश /O R D E R
PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal of the assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -8, Chennai, dated 22.08.2017 and pertains to assessment year 2012-13.
There was a delay of one day in filing this appeal by the assessee. The assessee has filed a petition for condonation of delay. We have heard the Ld. counsel and the Ld. D.R. We find that there was sufficient cause for not filing the appeal before the stipulated time. Therefore, we condone the delay and admit the appeal.
Shri D. Anand, the Ld.counsel for the assessee, submitted that the CIT(Appeals) dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution, without going into the merit. According to the Ld. counsel, the CIT(Appeals) is having power coterminous with that of the Assessing Officer, therefore, it is for him to decide the matter on merit irrespective of the fact whether the assessee appeared before him or not. The Ld.counsel further submitted that the CIT(Appeals) has no power whatsoever for dismissing the appeal for non- appearance of the assessee. Therefore, the Ld.counsel submitted that the matter may be remitted back to the file of the CIT(Appeals).
We heard Ms. S. Vijayaprabha, the Ld. Departmental Representative also. As rightly submitted by the Ld.counsel for the assessee, the CIT(Appeals) being a first Appellate Authority, having coterminous power as that of the Assessing Officer, is expected to call for assessment records from the Assessing Officer and dispose the appeal on merit irrespective of the fact whether the assessee appeared or not. What is required is to give sufficient opportunity to the assessee. Therefore, whether the assessee failed to appear or availed the opportunity given by the CIT(Appeals), it is for the CIT(Appeals) to dispose of the appeal on merit. This Tribunal is of the considered opinion that the CIT(Appeals) has no authority or power to dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee for non- appearance of the assessee. Therefore, the CIT(Appeals) is expected to adjudicate the appeal on merit. Since the CIT(Appeals) has not adjudicated the appeal on merit, this Tribunal is of the considered opinion that the matter needs to be reconsidered.
Accordingly, the order of the CIT(Appeals) is set aside and the entire issue is remitted back to his file. The CIT(Appeals) shall dispose of the appeal on merit after giving a reasonable opportunity to the assessee.
It is made clear that if the assessee fails to appear before the CIT(Appeals) after issue of notice for hearing, it is open to the CIT(Appeals) to call for assessment records and dispose of the grounds raised by the assessee, on merit.
With the above observation, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 27th April, 2018 at Chennai.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026