ACIT, CIRCLE-32, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. CHANDA DEVI NATHANI, KOLKATA
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
Following the CBDT Circular No. 3/2018, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Revenue as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT. The tax effect in the appeal did not exceed the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT Circular No. 3/2018.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the tax effect being below the prescribed monetary limit as per CBDT Circular No. 3/2018.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘C’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Smt. Madhumita Roy
Assessment Year: 2012-13 Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-32, Kolkata.....…...................….......…....... Appellant Chanda Devi Nathani...........................................…………..………………………………..….……......Respondent DB-73 Nathani House Salt Lake City 24 Sector-I Kolkata – 700 064 [PAN : ABOPN 5150 F] Appearances by: None, appeared on behalf of the assessee. Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT, Sr. D/R. appearing on behalf of the Revenue. Date of concluding the hearing : September 12th, 2018 Date of pronouncing the order : September 14th , 2018 ORDER Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, AM :- In this appeal of the revenue, the undisputed fact is that the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limit of Rs.20,00,000/-, as fixed by the CBDT Circular No.3/2018, F. NO. 279/Misc. 142/2007-ITJ (Pt), dt. 11th July, 2018. As mandated by this above referred Circular No. 3/2018, this appeal of the revenue is dismissed as withdrawn. In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed.
Kolkata, the 14th day of September, 2018. Sd/- Sd/- [Madhumita Roy] [J. Sudhakar Reddy] Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated : 14.09.2018 {SC SPS}
Assessment Year: 2012-13 Chanda Devi Nathani Copy of the order forwarded to:
Chanda Devi Nathani DB-73 Nathani House Salt Lake City 24 Sector-I Kolkata – 700 064 2. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-32, Kolkata 3. CIT(A)- 4. CIT- , 5. CIT(DR), Kolkata Benches, Kolkata.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026