DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 4(1), CHENNAI vs. MALABAR HOTELS PVT. LTD., CHENNAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the jurisdictional High Court's decision in CIT vs. Industrial Security & Intelligence India Pvt Ltd. was binding. This decision, following Supreme Court rulings, allowed deduction for employee contributions paid before the due date of filing the return, even if paid after the statutory due date.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the deletion of an addition of ₹46,20,690/- made on account of employees' contribution to welfare funds. The addition was made under Section 36(i)(va) read with Section 2(24)(x) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee had remitted the contribution after the due date prescribed by law but before the due date for filing the return of income.
What were the issues?
Whether employee contributions to welfare funds remitted after the statutory due date but before the return filing due date are eligible for deduction under Section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. AIMIL Ltd.1,629 citing321 ITR 508 · 2010 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Alom Extrusions Ltd.1,344 citing185 Taxmann 416 · 2009 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH : CHENNAI
Before: SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN & SHRI ABRAHAM P. GEORGE]
आदेश / O R D E R
PER ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:-
In this appeal filed by the Revenue, which is directed against an order dated 15.05.2017 of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-8, Chennai, it has taken altogether three grounds of which ground No.1 & 3 are general needing no specific adjudication.
Ground No.2 which is the only effective ground is reproduced hereunder:-
2 -: ‘’2. The CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition of ₹46,20,690/- made u/s 36(i)(va) r.w.s 2(24)(x) of the Income tax Act, 1961. 2.1 As per the provisions of section 36(1)(va) deduction in respect of any sum received by the tax payer as contribution from his employees towards any welfare fund of such employees is allowed only if such sum is credited by the tax payer to the employees' account in the relevant fund on or before the due date. Due date means the date by which the assessee is required as an employer to credit such contribution to the employee's account in the relevant fund under the provisions of any law or term of contract of service or otherwise. 2.2 It is pertinent to mention that the provisions of section 43B of the Income tax Act 1961 is not applicable in the case of employees' contribution towards PF/ESI. 2.3 It is submitted that the CBDT in Circular No. 22/2015 dated 17.12.2015 has clarified that deduction relating to employees' contribution to welfare funds are governed by section 36(1)(va) of the Incometax Act. This circular was issued by the CBDT in the light of the judicial decision in the case of CIT vs Alom Extrusions Ltd (2009) 185 TAXMAN 416 (SC). 2.4 The decision of the jurisdictional High Court in the case of M/s. Industrial Security & Intelligence India Pvt. Ltd, has not been accepted and a Review Petition has been filed before the Hon’ble High Court of Madras’’.
Ld. Counsel for the Revenue submitted that Revenue had not 3. accepted the judgment of Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT vs. Industrial Security & Intelligence India Pvt Ltd. (TCS No.585 & 586 of 2015, dated 24.07.2015). According to him, contribution by the employees, towards welfare funds, remitted after due date prescribed in the respective enactments had to be disallowed u/s.36(i)
(va) of the Act. Reliance was also placed on CBDT Circular No.22/2015, dated 17.12.2015.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee.
We have considered the submissions of the ld. Departmental 5.
Representative and perused the orders of the authorities below. What has been held by Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Industrial Security & Intelligence India Pvt Ltd. (supra) is reproduced hereunder:-
’5. We find that the Tribunal has righty relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Alom Extrusions Ltd, reported in 319 ITR 306, whereby the Supreme Court held that omission of second proviso to Section 43B and amendment to first proviso by Finance Act, 2003 are curative in nature and are effective retrospectively. i.e. with effect from 01.01.1988 i.e the date of insertion of first proviso. The Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs. Amil Ltd, reported in 321 ITR 508 held that if the assessee had deposited employee’s contribution towards Provident Fund and ESI after due date as prescribed under the relevant Act, but before the due date of filing of return under the Income Tax Act, no disallowance could be made in view of the provisions of Section 43B as amended by Finance Act, 2003.
In the present case, the assessee had remitted the employees contribution beyond the due date for payment, but within the due date for filing the return of income. Hence, following the above said decisions, we find no reason to differ with the findings of the Tribunal. Accordingly, we find no question of law much less any substantial question of law arises for consideration in these appeals.
4 -: Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court had also considered CBDT Circular No.22/2015, dated 17.12.2015 while giving the above judgment. In the circumstances, we do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. 6.
Order pronounced in the open court at the time of hearing on 31st May, 2018 at Chennai.
More judgments on Section 36(1)(va)
- Vco Consulatatns and Sevices Private… vs ITO, Corporate Ward 3(3), ChennaiITA 2145/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- R K Swamy Limited, Chennai vs DCIT Non Corporate Circle 10(1), ChennaiITA 504/CHNY/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- M/S. R.K. Swamy Ltd., Chennai vs DCIT, Ncc-10(1), ChennaiITA 2822/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 838/IND/2025[2022-2023]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2022-2023
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026