DCIT, CIR-2(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S NICCO CORPORATION LTD., KOLKATA
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the tax effect was below the CBDT's revised monetary limit for appeals. Consequently, the Revenue's appeal was treated as withdrawn and dismissed. The assessee's cross-objections were also dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT, and the assessee filed cross-objections. The tax effect in the Revenue's appeal was below the revised monetary limit set by the CBDT for filing appeals.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal should be dismissed due to the tax effect being below the CBDT's revised monetary limit for appeals before the Tribunal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH ‘C’, KOLKATA
Before: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy, AM & Smt. Madhumita Roy, JM]
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
order
: September 13, 2018 ORDER
PER MADHUMITA ROY, JM
The instant appeal has been filed by the revenue against the order dated 04.02.2016 passed by the Ld. CIT(A) -5, Kolkata arising out of the order dated 29.12.2006 passed by the ACIT Circle 2(2), Kolkata. Both the cross-objections have been filed by the assessee against the appeal preferred by the revenue.
As pointed out by Ld. Counsel for the assessee, the tax effect involved in this appeal of the Revenue is less than the revised monetary limit of Rs.20 Lacs fixed by the CBDT for filing the Revenue’s appeals before the Tribunal. The CBDT vide its recent Circular No.3/2018 issued on 11.07.2018 has revised the monetary limit for filing the appeals of the Revenue before the Tribunal to Rs.20 Lacs. As clarified in the said Circular, the revised monetary limit of Rs.20 Lacs or filing the Revenue’s appeals before the ITAT would apply also to the appeals already filed by the Revenue which are pending before the Tribunal and the same are liable to be dismissed as withdrawn/not pressed. We accordingly treat this appeal of the Revenue involving the tax effect of less than Rs.20 Lacs as withdrawn/not pressed keeping in view the Circular No.3/2018 (supra) issued by CBDT and dismiss the same.
Cross appeals preferred by the assessee have also been withdrawn today before us. The same are also dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the revenue as well as cross- objection of the assessee are dismissed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 13th September, 2018.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026