DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. CHHABI ELECTRICALS PVT. LTD., JALGAON
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal of the Revenue was liable to be dismissed due to low tax effect, as per the CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 which raised the monetary limit for filing appeals to Rs. 20 lakhs.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A) which had restricted an addition on account of bogus purchases. The tax effect involved in the appeal was less than Rs. 20 lakhs.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal should be dismissed on the grounds of low tax effect in light of the prevailing CBDT circular.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, PUNE
Before: SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM & SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JM
आदेश / ORDER
PER VIKAS AWASTHY, JM :
The appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Nashik dated 27-01-2016 for the assessment year 2009-10.
Shri C.H. Naniwadekar appearing on behalf of the assessee submitted at the outset that the appeal of the Revenue is liable to be dismissed on account of low tax effect in terms of recent CBDT Circular No. 3/2018, dated 11-07-2018.
2 ITA No. 588/PUN/2016, A.Y. 2009-10
Shri Mukesh Jha representing the Department fairly admitted that in the present appeal by the Department tax effect is less than Rs.20 lakhs.
Both sides heard. The Revenue is in appeal against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in restricting/deleting the addition on account of bogus purchases. The Assessing Officer made addition of Rs.56,33,551/- on account of bogus purchases. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) restricted the addition to Rs.5,63,355/-, thereby granting relief of Rs.50,70,196/-. Against the relief allowed, the Revenue is in appeal. Undisputedly, the tax effect involved in appeal is less than the monetary limit prescribed by recent CBDT Circular for filing of appeals before the Tribunal by the Department. The CBDT vide Circular No. 3/2018, dated 11-07-2018 has raised the monetary limit of tax effect for filing of appeals by the Department before the Tribunal to Rs.20 lakhs. The circular applies to the appeals to be filed by the Department in future, as well as the appeals pending before the Tribunal. Thus, in view of the above CBDT Circular, the present appeal of the Revenue is liable to be dismissed on account of low tax effect.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court at the time of hearing on Thursday, the 19th day of July, 2018.
Sd/- Sd/- (डी. करुणाकरा राव/D. Karunakara Rao) (ववकास अवस्थी / Vikas Awasthy) ऱेखा सदस्य / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER न्याययक सदस्य / JUDICIAL MEMBER ऩुणे / Pune; ददनाांक / Dated : 19th July, 2018 RK
3 ITA No. 588/PUN/2016, A.Y. 2009-10
आदेश की प्रयिलऱवऩ अग्रेवषि / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अऩीऱाथी / The Appellant. 1. प्रत्यथी / The Respondent. 2. आयकर आयुक्त (अऩीऱ) / The CIT(A)-2, Nashik 3. 4. The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Nashik ववभागीय प्रयतयनधध, आयकर अऩीऱीय अधधकरण, “बी” बेंच, 5. ऩुणे / DR, ITAT, “B” Bench, Pune. गाडड फ़ाइऱ / Guard File. 6. //सत्यावऩत प्रयत // True Copy// आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER,
यनजी सधचव / Private Secretary, आयकर अऩीऱीय अधधकरण, ऩुणे / ITAT, Pune
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026