Facts
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) who had deleted an addition of Rs. 71,73,954/- made by the Assessing Officer on account of unexplained investment under section 69 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Revenue then appealed this deletion to the ITAT, which had previously dismissed the appeal on the grounds of low tax effect.
Held
The ITAT, in this present order, considered the updated monetary limits for filing appeals as per CBDT Circular No. 9 of 2024, which set the limit at Rs. 60 lacs. The tax effect in this case was Rs. 55,41,880/-, which is below the revised limit. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed on this ground.
Key Issues
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable given the revised monetary limits for appeals, and if the ITAT's previous order on tax effect was factually incorrect.
Sections Cited
69, 143(3), 115BBE, 254, 268A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DIVISION BENCH, AMRITSAR
Before: SHRI UDAYAN DAS GUPTA & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY
आदेशकीप्रनतनलपपअग्रेपर्त/ Copy of the order forwarded to : 1. अपीलधथी/ The Appellant 2. प्रत्यथी/ The Respondent 3. आयकरआयुक्त/ CIT 4. पवभधगीयप्रनतनिनर्, आयकरअपीलीयआनर्करण, चण्डीगढ़/ DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 5. गधडाफधईल/ Guard File
आदेशधिुसधर/ By order, सहधयकपंजीकधर/ Assistant Registrar
146-Asr-2022 Smt. Jatinder Kaur, Jalandhar