ASHOK KUMAR CHOPRA,JALANDHAR vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

PDF
ITA 353/ASR/2023Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar01 April 2025AY 2011-12Bench: SHRI UDAYAN DAS GUPTA (Judicial Member), SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed as withdrawn

Facts

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT (A) for assessment year 2011-12. The assessee subsequently filed an application to withdraw the appeal.

Held

The Tribunal considered the assessee's application for withdrawal, noting that the assessee had availed the benefit of the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024' to resolve the dispute.

Key Issues

Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee availing the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme'.

Sections Cited

254(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DIVISION BENCH, AMRITSAR

Before: SHRI UDAYAN DAS GUPTA & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY

For Respondent: Shri Manpreet Singh Duggal, Sr.DR
Hearing: 19.03.2025Pronounced: 01.04.2025

PER KRINWANT SAHAY, AM

The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short ‘the CIT (A)’] dated 28.11.2023 passed for assessment year 2011-12. 2. The assessee has filed an application for withdrawal of this appeal on the ground that he has availed benefit of 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024’ and he has resolved the A.Y.2011-12 2

dispute with the Revenue under this Scheme. Necessary certificate in Form No.2 under Rule 5 has been issued to him which is placed on record.

3.

Considering the prayer of the assessee, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn because in view of this settlement of dispute under 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme', it becomes infructuous. However, it is made clear that in case, on account of some technicalities, assessee failed to avail the full benefit of this Scheme, then both sides will be at liberty to get the appeal revived after filing of application under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act. Such application be filed within due date of limitation provided under this Scheme.

4.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced on 01.04.2025. (UDAYAN DAS GUPTA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER “Poonam” A.Y.2011-12 3 आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/ Copy of the order forwarded to : अिीिार्थी/ The Appellant 1. प्रत्यर्थी/ The Respondent 2. आयकर आयुक्त/ CIT 3. तिभागीय प्रतितिति, आयकर अिीिीय आतिकरण, चण्डीगढ़/ DR, ITAT, Amritsar 4. गाडड फाईि/ Guard File 5. आदेशािुसार/ By order, सहायक िंजीकार/

ASHOK KUMAR CHOPRA,JALANDHAR vs ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR | BharatTax