PFIZER LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ACIT-10(3)(2)(ERSTWHILE DCIT-8(2), MUMBAI

order dated 23/12/2015 of the CIT(A)- 17, Mumbai,the Assessee has filed the present appeal.Assessee- company ,engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading in pharmaceuticals,filed its return of income on 31/10/2007 declaring total income at Rs.363. 79 crores.The Assessing Officer (AO)completed assessment,on 21/10/201, u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Act, determining its income at Rs.552.25/- crores. 2.During the course of hearing before us, the Authorised Representative stated that the order of the AO was challenged before the First Appellate Authority (FAA), that he had restored back the issue to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication, that the AO,while giving appeal effect had allowed the claim of the assessee,that the appeal filed before the Tribunal had become infructuous.In the background of the above events,the appeal filed has become infructuous. So, we dismiss the same. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed. फलतः िनधा�रती �ारा दािखल क� गई अपील नामंजूर क� जाती है. Order pronounced in the open court on 1st March, 2018. आदेश क� घोषणा खुले �यायालय म� �दनांक 01 माच�, 2018 को क� गई । Sd/- Sd/- (अमरजीत �सह / Amarjit Singh ) (राजे�� / Rajendra) �याियक सद�य / JUDICIAL MEMBER लेखा लेखा लेखा सद�य लेखा सद�य सद�य / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER सद�य मुंबई Mumbai; �दनांक/Dated : 01.3.2018. Jv.Sr.PS. अ�ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : आदेश क� क� �ितिलिप �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत आदेश आदेश आदेश क� क� �ितिलिप �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत अ�ेिषत 1.Appellant /अपीलाथ� 2. Respondent /��यथ� 3.The concerned CIT(A)/संब� अपीलीय आयकर आयु�, 4.The concerned CIT /संब� आयकर आयु� 5.DR “ C ” Bench, ITAT, Mumbai /िवभागीय �ितिनिध, खंडपीठ,आ.अ.�याया.मुंबई

2613/M/16-Pfizer Ltd.