LT FOODS LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ADDI. CIT SPECIAL RANGE-5, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that disallowance under Section 14A cannot exceed the exempt income claimed. Since the exempt income was Rs. 66,810/- and the disallowance was significantly higher, the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer could not be sustained.
What were the facts?
The assessee received Rs. 66,810/- as exempt income, comprising share in partnership profit and dividend income. The assessee suo motu disallowed Rs. 8,44,669/- under Section 14A, which was increased to Rs. 1,35,74,360/- by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance of expenses under Section 14A could exceed the exempt income earned by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Joint Investments Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT803 citing372 ITR 694 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’, NEW DELHI
Before: Shri Kul BharatDr. B. R. R. Kumar
ORDER
Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member:
The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT(A)-36, New Delhi dated 18.10.2019.
The only issue raised before us pertains to disallowance of expenses u/s 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. During the year, the assessee received total amount of Rs.66,810/- in respect of which exemption was claimed u/s 10 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The amount consists of Rs.51,228/- on account of share in profit in the partnership firm, an amount of Rs.15,582/- on account of dividend income from mutual fund. The assessee has suo motu made disallowance of Rs.8,44,669/- u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D. The Assessing Officer has increased the disallowance to Rs.1,35,74,360/- which the ld. CIT(A) confirmed. Aggrieved, the LT Foods Ltd. assessee filed appeal before us. The facts are not in dispute. By this time, it is settled position that the disallowance u/s 14A of the Act cannot exceed exempt income claimed. Since, in the instant case, the exempt income claimed by the assessee was Rs.66,810/- and the disallowance already made were to the tune of Rs.8,44,699/-, respectfully placing reliance on the judgment of Hon’ble High Court in the case of Joint Investment Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CIT (372 ITR 694) wherein the appeal filed by the Revenue was also dismissed in SLP No. 23650 of 2018 and CIT Vs. Caraf Builders (Del-HC), we hold that disallowance made by the Assessing Officer cannot be sustained.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 03/01/2024.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026