DILSE CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(Exemption) had dismissed the application ex-parte without proper consideration. Therefore, the matter was remanded back to the CIT(Exemption) for fresh consideration.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemption) dismissed the application ex-parte due to non-compliance on the hearing dates.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemption) was justified in dismissing the application for registration ex-parte without affording sufficient opportunity to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH “D”, KOLKATA
Before: SH. J.SUDHAKAR REDDY & SH. S.S.VISWANETHRA RAVIvs CIT(E),
ORDER
PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER This appeal by the assessee against the order dated 14.11.2017 passed by CIT(Exemption), Kolkata wherein he dismissed application in Form No.10 A seeking registration u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “Act”) ex-parte.
The Ld. AR filed an application dated 06.09.2018 seeking adjournment on the ground that he requires important clarification from the assessee. On perusal of the record, we find that CIT(Exemption) fixed the date of hearing on 18.08.2017 and 15.09.2017 on which dates, the assessee was represented by its Authorized Representative and the appeal was adjourned to 20.10.2017. According to CIT(Exemption), no compliance was made on 20.10.2017 and adjourned the case to 14.11.2017. For non-compliance, he dismissed the application ex-parte in Form No.10A filed by the assessee seeking registration u/s 12AA of the Act. Therefore, application dated 06.09.2018 seeking adjournment is rejected.
Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case as discussed in the afore-mentioned para and in the interests of justice, we deem it proper to remand the matter to the file of CIT(Exemption) for his consideration and the assessee is liberty to file all its evidences, if any, in support of its contentions and claims. Therefore, grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 05.10.2018.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026