DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BANGALORE vs. M/S. TOSHIBA SOFTWARE INDIA PVT. LTD, BANGALORE
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that expenses incurred in foreign currency towards telecommunication and other charges should be reduced from both export turnover and total turnover for computing deduction under Section 10A. This decision followed the jurisdictional High Court's ruling in CIT Vs. Tata Elxsi Ltd.
What were the facts?
The revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order concerning the assessment year 2008-09. The core issue was the treatment of expenses incurred in foreign currency for telecommunication and other charges.
What were the issues?
Whether expenses incurred in foreign currency towards telecommunication and other charges should be reduced from export turnover and total turnover for the purpose of Section 10A deduction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd.818 citing349 ITR 98 · 2012 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCH ‘ C ’
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO
Per Shri Vijay Pal Rao, J.M. : This appeal by the revenue is directed against the order dt.22.07.2016 of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-14, Bangalore for the Assessment Year 2008-09.
The revenue has raised the following grounds :
2 IT(TP)A No.1814/Bang/2016
The only issue raised by the revenue in this appeal is regarding the expenses incurred in foreign currency towards telecommunication charges and other expenses from export turnover as well as total turnover for computation of deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act').
We have heard the learned D.R. as well as learned A.R. and considered the relevant material on record. We find that the issue of expenditure incurred towards telecommunication charges and other expenses in foreign currency is reduced from export turnover an equal
3 IT(TP)A No.1814/Bang/2016 amount should also be reduced from total turnover while computing the deduction under section 10A of the Act, is covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Tata Elxsi Ltd. 349 ITR 98 (Kar). The decision of Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court has been followed in a number of cases in co- ordinate benches of ITAT. Hence, this issue is decided against the revenue and in favour of assessee.
In the result, the appeal of revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 27th Sept., 2017.
More judgments on Section 10A
- Ahaguru Education Technology Private… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1993/CHNY/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- M/S. Aradhyaa Infra & Holdings Pvt. Ltd… vs ITO, Corp. Ward-1(1), ChennaiITA 1793/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Tech Mahindra Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT Cir 2(3), MumbaiITA 7487/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: Disposed24 Aug 2026AY 2008-09
- D.C.I.T. Circle 3(3), Mumbai vs Rbs Business Services P. Ltd., MumbaiITA 4467/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2007-08
- Rbs Business Services P.Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT Cir 3(3), MumbaiITA 4306/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026