DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE vs. M/S. AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT LTD., BANGALORE
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that telecommunication and travelling expenses in foreign currency, when reduced from export turnover, should also be reduced from total turnover for computing Section 10A deduction. This decision followed the jurisdictional High Court's ruling in CIT Vs. Tata Elxsi Ltd.
What were the facts?
The revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order concerning the assessment year 2008-09. The core issue was the exclusion of telecommunication and travelling expenses incurred in foreign currency from export turnover for Section 10A deduction.
What were the issues?
Whether telecommunication and travelling expenses in foreign currency should be excluded from export turnover and total turnover for the purpose of calculating deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd.818 citing349 ITR 98 · 2012 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCH ‘ C ’
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO
Per Shri Vijay Pal Rao, J.M. : This appeal by the revenue and Cross Objection by the assessee are directed against the order dt.30.06.2016 of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-14, Bangalore for the Assessment Year 2008-09.
C.O. NO.25/Bang/2017 2. The revenue has raised the following grounds :
Thus it is clear that the only issue raised by the revenue is regarding exclusion of telecommunication expenses and travelling expenses incurred in foreign currency from export turnover as well as total turnover for computation of deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act').
The assessee in the cross objection has supported the order of the CIT (Appeals).
C.O. NO.25/Bang/2017 5. We have heard the rival submissions and considered the relevant material on record. We find that the issue of expenditure incurred towards telecommunication charges and travelling expenses in foreign currency is reduced from export turnover an equal amount should also be reduced from total turnover while computing the deduction under section 10A of the Act, is covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Tata Elxsi Ltd. 349 ITR 98 (Kar). The decision of Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court has been followed in a number of cases in co-ordinate benches of ITAT. Hence, this issue is decided against the revenue and in favour of assessee.
In the result, the revenue’s appeal as well as C.O. of assessee are dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 27th Sept., 2017.
More judgments on Section 10A
- Ahaguru Education Technology Private… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1993/CHNY/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- M/S. Aradhyaa Infra & Holdings Pvt. Ltd… vs ITO, Corp. Ward-1(1), ChennaiITA 1793/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Tech Mahindra Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT Cir 2(3), MumbaiITA 7487/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: Disposed24 Aug 2026AY 2008-09
- D.C.I.T. Circle 3(3), Mumbai vs Rbs Business Services P. Ltd., MumbaiITA 4467/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2007-08
- Rbs Business Services P.Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT Cir 3(3), MumbaiITA 4306/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sunita Bhagat Proprietor Of Krishab Impex vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Arun Aloysius Barnes vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 14 Oct 2026
- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026