HARBHAJAN SINGH KAHLON,GURDASPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , GURDASPUR

PDF
ITA 519/ASR/2024Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 April 2025AY 2012-13Bench: SHRI UDAYAN DAS GUPTA (Judicial Member), SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed as withdrawn

Facts

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for the assessment year 2012-13. The assessee has since availed the benefit of the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024' and resolved the dispute with the Revenue.

Held

The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn because the dispute was settled under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme', rendering the appeal infructuous. However, the parties are at liberty to revive the appeal under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act if the assessee fails to get the full benefit due to technicalities.

Key Issues

Whether the appeal can be dismissed as withdrawn due to settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Sections Cited

254(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DIVISION BENCH, AMRITSAR

Before: SHRI UDAYAN DAS GUPTA & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY

For Respondent: Shri Bharat Bhushan Garg, CIT DR
Hearing: 09.04.2025Pronounced: 24.04.2025

PER KRINWANT SAHAY, AM

The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against

the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in

short ‘the CIT (A)’] dated 15.07.2024 passed for assessment

year 2012-13.

2.

The assessee has filed an application for withdrawal of

this appeal on the ground that he has availed benefit of

ITA No.519/ASR/2024 A.Y.2012-13 2

'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024’ and he has resolved the

dispute with the Revenue under this Scheme. Necessary

certificate in Form No.2 under Rule 5 has been issued to him

which is placed on record.

3.

Considering the prayer of the assessee, this appeal is

dismissed as withdrawn because in view of this settlement of

dispute under 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme', it becomes

infructuous. However, it is made clear that in case, on

account of some technicalities, assessee failed to avail the

full benefit of this Scheme, then both sides will be at liberty

to get the appeal revived after filing of application under

Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act. Such application be

filed within due date of limitation provided under this

Scheme.

4.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as

withdrawn.

Order pronounced on 24.04.2025.

Sd/- Sd/- (UDAYAN DAS GUPTA) (KRINWANT SAHAY) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER “Poonam”

ITA No.519/ASR/2024 A.Y.2012-13 3

आदेश क� �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/ Copy of the order forwarded to : अपीलाथ�/ The Appellant 1. ��यथ�/ The Respondent 2. आयकर आयु�/ CIT 3. िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय आिधकरण, च�डीगढ़/ DR, ITAT, Amritsar 4. गाड� फाईल/ Guard File 5.

आदेशानुसार/ By order, सहायक पंजीकार/ Assistant Registrar

HARBHAJAN SINGH KAHLON,GURDASPUR vs INCOME TAX OFFICER , GURDASPUR | BharatTax