Facts
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT after a delay of 5 months, as the CIT(A) had dismissed the appeal without considering the merits. The assessee's AR submitted that the delay was due to the assessee not being aware of the Assessing Officer's order.
Held
The Tribunal condoned the delay of 5 months, set aside the order of the CIT(A), and restored the issue to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. This was subject to a cost of Rs. 50,000/- payable to the Jharkhand Income Tax Bar Association.
Key Issues
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) should be condoned and the appeal decided on merits.
Sections Cited
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld CIT(A) This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld CIT(A) This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi dated dated 14.8.2024 in Appeal No.NFAC/2014- -15/10172595 for the assessment year 2015 2015-16.
P a g e 1 | 3
Shri Khub Chand Pandya, ld SR DR appeared for the revenue and Shri Sharwan Kumar Jha,ld AR appeared for the assessee.
It was submitted by ld AR that there was delay of 5 months before the ld CIT(A). However, the ld CIT(A) did not condone the delay and dismissed the appeal without considering the merits of the case. He prayed that the delay in filing of appeal before the ld CIT(A) be condoned and the appeal be decided on merits. It was submitted by ld AR that the assessee was not aware of the order being passed by the Assessing Officer. There was no other intention not to file the appeal within the stipulated time period.
On consideration of the facts of the case and the reasons given by ld AR for not filing the appeal before the ld CIT(A) are found to be plausible. Hence, we condone the delay of 5 months in filing the appeal before the ld CIT(A). As the ld CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal on the ground of condonation of delay, we set aside the order of ld CIT(A) and restore the issue to the file of the Assessing Officer for adjudicating the issue denovo subject to a cost of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees fifty thousand only payable to Jharkhand Income Tax Bar Association within 60 days from the date of this order. If the amount is not paid within the time, the order of the ld CIT(A) stands confirmed. The receipt of payment of Rs.50,000/- shall be shown to the Assessing Officer for taking up the issue for adjudication.
P a g e 2 | 3
In the result, appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes
Order dictated and pronounced in the open court on 9/06/2025.
Sd/- Sd/- (RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY) (GEORGE MATHAN) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Ranchi; Dated 09/06/2025 B.K.Parida, SPS (OS) Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant : Divij Steel and Power Pvt Ltd., 21, Raain Basera Society, Tola Adituyapur, Jamshedpur 2. The Respondent: Addl/JCIT, National Faceless Assessment Centre, New Delhi 3. The CIT(A)-NFAC, Delhi 4. Pr.CIT,Jamshedpur 5. DR, ITAT, 6. Guard file. //True Copy// By order
Sr.Pvt.secretary ITAT, Ranchi
P a g e 3 | 3