SAINI MOTOR FINANCE CO. PVT. LTD. (NOW MERGED WITH M/S. ATIBIR INDUSTRIES CO. LTD.,),KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 1(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2471/KOL/2017Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 October 2018AY 2009-103 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal. It set aside the ex-parte order of the CIT(A) and remanded the case for fresh adjudication on merits, with an opportunity for the assessee to be heard.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal was filed with a significant delay. The lower appellate authority had passed an ex-parte order without adjudicating the case on merits.

What were the issues?

Whether the ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A) was justified and whether the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from appearing before the lower appellate authority.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 68,Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘B’ BENCH, KOLKATA

Before: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Appearances by: Shri A. Dudhewala, ACA, appeared on behalf of the assessee. Shri A.K. Tiwari, CIT, D/R. appearing on behalf of the Revenue. Date of concluding the hearing : September 9th, 2018 Date of pronouncing the order : October24th , 2018 ORDER Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, AM :- This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Kolkata, (hereinafter the ‘Ld. CIT(A)’), dt. 31/01/2017, passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the ‘Act’), relating to Assessment Year 2009-10, wherein the addition made u/s 68 of the Act, was confirmed.

2.

There is a delay of 229 days in filing of the appeal by the revenue. After perusing the petition filed for condonation of delay, we are convinced that the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal in time. Hence the delay is condoned and appeal admitted.

3.

We have heard rival contentions. On careful consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, perusal of the papers on record, orders of the authorities below as well as case law cited, we hold as follows:- We are convinced that the assessee was prevented from sufficient cause from appearing before the ld. ICT(A) on the date of hearing. We are of the considered opinion that this appeal should be set aside to the file of the ld. CIT(A), for fresh adjudication as Assessment Year: 2009-10 Saini Motor Finance Co. Pvt. Ltd he has passed an ex-parte order and has not disposed off the case on merits. The ld. CIT(A), shall consider the development of law on this issue and dispose of these appeals, afresh, after giving the assessee adequate opportunity of being heard. The assessee is directed to appear before the ld. CIT(A) within one month of receipt of this order, either by himself or through his Authorised Representative, take notice and thereafter continue to co-operate till the disposal of the appeal.

5.

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Kolkata, the 24th day of October, 2018. Sd/- Sd/- [S.S. Viswanethra Ravi] [J. Sudhakar Reddy] Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated : 24.10.2018 {SC SPS} Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Saini Motor Finance Co. Pvt. Ltd (now merged with M/s Atibir Industries Co. Ltd.) 20B, Abdul Hamid Street 7th Floor Block-7B Kolkata – 700 069 2. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2), Kolkata 3. CIT(A)- 4. CIT- , 5. CIT(DR), Kolkata Benches, Kolkata.

More judgments on Section 68

All 29,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 68 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →