RATNASAGAR HERBALS(P) LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-8(2)KOL., KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the lower authorities had not properly considered the details provided by the assessee regarding the unsecured loans. Therefore, the matter was remanded back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal concerned the addition of unsecured loans and interest paid on them as unexplained cash credits and expenditure. The lower authorities had added these amounts without detailed consideration of the documents submitted by the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether the unsecured loans and interest paid thereon were correctly treated as unexplained cash credits and expenditure without proper consideration of the assessee's evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH “B”, KOLKATA
Before: SH. S.S.GODARA & SH. M.BALAGANESH
ORDER
PER SH. S.S.GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER This assessee’s appeal for AY 2012-13 arises against the order dated 23.11.2016 passed by the CIT(A)-3, Kolkata in Appeal No.202/CIT(A)-3/Cir- 8(2)/15-16/Kol in proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income tax Act, 1961 (in short “Act”). Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
The assessee has raised two substantive grounds in the instant appeal seeking to reverse both the lower authorities’ action adding unsecured loans of Rs.77.90 lakhs to be unexplained cash credits as well as interests upon paid in the relevant previous year to the tune of Rs.13,01,547/- as unexplained expenditure, made in the course of assessment and affirmed during lower appellate proceedings. We notice at the outset that Ld.CIT(A) has proceeded to decide the assessee’s appeal as per its written submissions. He holds the impugned loans to be lacking genuineness and creditworthiness of the creditors in question namely M/s Technika Softward (P.) Ltd., Essman Impex (P) Ltd., Orientation Academic (P.) Ltd. The taxpayer appears to have filed all the relevant details including income tax returns, accounts confirmation, bank statement, company master data and Year: 2012-13] enrolment certificate of the said three parties; both in the assessment as well as lower appellate proceedings. The same have not been considered in detail in any of the two proceedings. We therefore deem it appropriate in these peculiar facts and circumstances that larger interest of justice would be served in case the CIT(A) decides the entire issue once again after affording three effective opportunities to the taxpayer. We make it clear that assessee’s failure in not completing its arguments during the said specified number of opportunities would amount to vacation of our instant remand direction.
This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms. Order pronounced in the open court on 26.10.2018.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026