GEE ISPAT PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 10(1), NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
As per Section 33 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, once liquidation is initiated, no proceedings can be instituted by or against the corporate debtor, including those arising from revenue claims. Therefore, the appeal has no consequences.
What were the facts?
The assessee company is under liquidation, and its assets have been sold and distributed among secured creditors. The Income Tax Department had a claim of Rs. 29,68,19,163/-, and the final distribution of profits from liquidated assets has been completed.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal remains valid and consequential given the company's liquidation and distribution of assets under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES : C : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI M. BALAGANESH & SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA
BEFORE SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2010-11 Gee Ispat Pvt. Ltd., Vs DCIT, SU-217, Sector-19, Circle-10(1), Pitampura, New Delhi. New Delhi – 110 088. PAN: AACCG0954G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Ms Medha Pandey, Advocate Revenue by : Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 15.01.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 15.01.2024 ORDER
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:
This is appeal preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 30.01.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-24, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as Ld. First Appellate Authority or in short Ld. ‘FAA’) in appeal No.230/17-18 arising out of the appeal before it against the order dated 27.12.2017 passed u/s 147/143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as ‘the Act’) by the DCIT, Circle 10(1), Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Ld. AO).
Heard and perused the record. Ms Medha Pandey, Advocate appeared for the assessee and the only submission she made was that the assessee company is under liquidation and notices are being issued to the former directors of the assessee who, after the liquidation have no interest.
Further, a communication is received from the office of Mrs. Pooja Bahry, the liquidator of the assessee company and, after going through the same, it transpires that the notice issued in this appeal has already been received by the Liquidator through the Advocate of the ex-directors. The ld. Liquidator has apprised by way of this communication that consequent to the liquidation proceedings all assets of the assessee company have been sold and realized and amount distributed as per section 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. It has been submitted that a claim of Rs.29,68,19,163/- was made by Income Tax Department and the final distribution of profits of the liquidated assets in the matter has already been done among the secured financial creditors.
Considering the aforesaid, it comes up that as per Section 33 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, when liquidation process was initiated and order made, no suite or proceedings shall be instituted by or against the corporate debtor and those proceedings also include proceedings arising out of any claim of the Revenue. Thus the appeal of assessee is left with no consequences.
In the light of the aforesaid, we are inclined to dismiss the appeal of the assessee.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026