ASIA PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL,TIRUPUR vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1, TIRUPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal. It held that the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) requires verification of whether the recipient had paid tax, and thus remitted the issue back to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT with a significant delay. The primary issue was a disallowance made by the Assessing Officer under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) is warranted when the recipient has already paid tax. The need for the Assessing Officer to verify tax payment by the recipient.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN & SHRI S. JAYARAMAN
आदेश /O R D E R
PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal of the assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -3, Coimbatore, dated 23.05.2016 and pertains to assessment year 2012-13.
There was a delay of 471 days in filing the appeal before this Tribunal. The assessee has filed a petition for condonation of delay.
Having heard the Ld.counsel for the assessee and the Ld. D.R., this Tribunal is of the considered opinion that there was sufficient cause for not filing the appeal within specified time. Therefore, the delay of 471 days is hereby condoned and the appeal is admitted.
Now coming to the merit of the appeal, the only issue arises for consideration is disallowance made by the Assessing Officer under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act').
Shri V.S. Jayakumar, the Ld.counsel for the assessee, submitted that the recipient has already paid tax. Therefore, according to the Ld. counsel, in view of proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, there cannot be any disallowance.
We heard Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, the Ld. Departmental Representative also. The fact whether the recipient has paid the tax has to be verified and ascertained by the Assessing Officer. Therefore, this Tribunal is of the considered opinion that the Assessing Officer shall re-examine the matter in the light of the material that may be filed by the assessee. Accordingly, orders of both the authorities below are set aside and the issue of disallowance made by the Assessing Officer under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act is remitted back to the file of the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer shall re-examine the matter and find out whether the recipient has paid the tax on the amount received from the assessee and thereafter decide the issue afresh in accordance with law, after giving a reasonable opportunity to the assessee.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on 10th August, 2018 at Chennai.
More judgments on Section 40(a)(ia)
- Rekha Agarwal, Jaipur vs ITO WD 4(1), JaipurITA 844/JPR/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Cdg Petchem Limited, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward - 1(1), HyderabadITA 1900/HYD/2025[2018-2019]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-2019
- M/S. Shree Laminators Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 1534/KOL/2026[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-2012
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026