AQUA COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 21(1)(2), MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) for interest income earned on deposits with co-operative banks. This decision followed a co-ordinate bench's ruling on an identical issue.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a housing co-operative society, earned interest income from deposits with co-operative banks. The Assessing Officer (AO) and CIT(A) rejected the deduction claim under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, stating it only applied to interest from other co-operative societies, not banks.
What were the issues?
Whether interest income earned by a co-operative society from deposits with co-operative banks is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” Bench, Mumbai
O R D E R Per B.R. Baskaran (AM) :-
The appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 25- 03-2016 passed by Ld CIT(A)-33, Mumbai and it relates to the assessment year 2013-14. The solitary issue urged in this appeal is whether the assessee is eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act in respect of interest received from co-operative banks?
2. The assessee is a housing co-operative society. It earned interest income of Rs.30.91 lakhs from deposits kept with co-operative banks. The assessee claimed it as deductible u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act. The AO rejected the claim on the ground that interest received from other co-operative societies alone is deductible u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act and since the word “Bank” is not there in the above said section, the assessee is not eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act. The Ld CIT(A) also upheld the same.
2 Aqua Co-operative Housing Society Limited
We heard the parties on this issue and perused the record. We notice that an identical issue was considered by the co-ordinate bench in the case of Lands End Co-operative Housing society Ltd Vs. ITO (ITA No.3566/Mum/2014 dated 15-01-2016) and this issue was decided in favour of the assessee with the following observations:-
8.3 We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. We find that the CIT(A) enhanced the income of the assessee by rejecting the deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act of Rs.14,88,107/- being interest on investment with other Coop. banks by following the decision in the case of Bandra Samruddihi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.(Supra) which was passed on the basis of the decision passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Totagar’s Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. In the case of Totagar’s Co-operative Sale Society Ltd v/s ITAT (supra) the Hon’ble Supreme Court while interpreting the section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act held that surplus funds not immediately required in the business and invested in the short term deposit would be assessable under the head “income from other sources” where the Cooperative society is engaged in carrying on business of banking or providing credit facilities to its members and consequently no deduction is allowable u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. Whereas in the case before us the issue is whether a co-operative society which has derived income on investment with cooperative banks is entitled to deduction u/s 80P(2)(d). The provisions of Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act provide deduction in respect of income by way of interest or dividend on investments made with other Cooperative society. For the purposes of better proper understanding of these two provisions the relevant extract of the section are reproduced below:
80P: Deduction in respect of income of co-operative Societies. 1. Where, in the case of an assesssee being a co-operative society, the gross total income, includes any income referred to in sub-section (2), there shall be deducted, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this section, the sums specified in sub-section (2), in computing the total income of the assessee.
The sums referred to in sub-section (1) shall be the following, namely:-
(a)In the case of a co-operative society engaged in- (i) Carrying on the business of banking or providing credit facilities to its members.
The whole of the amount of profits and gains of business attributable to any one or more of much attributes.
3 Aqua Co-operative Housing Society Limited
(d)In respect of any income by way of interest or dividends derived by the co-operative society from its investments with any other co-operative society, the whole of such income.” From the close perusal of the provisions of u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) and 80P(2)(d) it is clear that the former deals with deduction in respect of profits and gain of business in case of the co-operative society carrying on business of banking or providing credit facilities to its members if the said income is assessable as income from business whereas latter provides for deduction in respect of income by way interest and dividend derived by assessee from its investments with other cooperative society. Thus it is amply clear that a cooperative society can only avail deduction u/s 80P(2)(d)(i) in respect of its income assessable as business income and not as income from other sources if it carries on business of the banking or providing credit facilities to its members and has income assessable under the head business whereas for claiming u/s 80P(2)(d) it must have income of interest and dividend on investments with other Co-operative society may or may not be engaged in the banking for providing credit facilities to its members and the head under which the income is assessable is not material for the claim of deduction under this section. Now will evaluate the assessee’s case in the light of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme court. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Totagar’s Co- operative Sale Society Ltd.(Supra) held that a society has surplus funds which are invested in short term deposits where the society is engaged in the business of banking or providing credit facilities to its members in that case the said income from short term deposits shall be treated and assessed as income from other sources and deduction u/s 80(P)(2)(a)(i) would not be available meaning thereby that deduction u/s 80(P)(2)(a)(i) is available only in respect of income which is assessable as business income and not as income from other sources. Whereas in distinction to this , the provisions of section 80(P)(2)(d) of the Act provides for deduction in respect of income of a coop society by way of interest or dividend from its investments with other coop society if such income is included in the gross total income of the such coop society. In view these facts and circumstances we are of the considered view that the assessee is entitled to the deduction of Rs. 14,88,107/- in respect of interest received/derived by it on deposits with coop. banks and therefore the appeal of the assessee is allowed by reversing the order of the CIT(A). The AO is directed accordingly.”
Consistent with the view taken by the co-ordinate bench, we hold that the assessee is entitled for deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act in respect of interest income earned on deposits kept with the co-operative banks. Accordingly we set aside the order passed by Ld CIT(A) on this issue and direct the AO to allow deduction as stated above.
4 Aqua Co-operative Housing Society Limited
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed. Order has been pronounced in the Court on 20.4.2018.
More judgments on Section 80P(2)(d)
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- S R P Jutha 13 Rajkot VI and Gr S Ma, Rajkot vs ITO WD 1(2)(1) Rajkot, RajkotITA 951/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Poonam Chambers B Wing Commercial Premises… vs Deputy Commissioner Income Tax, MumbaiITA 7044/MUM/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- Poonam Chambers B Wing Commercial Premises… vs Deputy Commissioner Income Tax, MumbaiITA 7043/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Suvarnakarara Co-Operative Society Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 2, KarwarITA 210/PAN/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026