NAZIA DAR ,SRINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD , KATRA
Facts
The Assessing Officer initiated proceedings under Section 148 against the assessee based on financial transactions and interest earned, leading to an addition of Rs. 90.98 lacs under Section 69. The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed *in limine* due to a 400-day delay in filing, which the CIT(A) did not condone. The assessee subsequently appealed to the ITAT, explaining that the delay was caused by her severe medical condition, including breast cancer surgery and ongoing treatment.
Held
The ITAT found that the assessee had a sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) due to her serious medical condition. Consequently, the Tribunal remanded the matter back to the CIT(A) with directions to admit the appeal, condone the delay, and decide all grounds of appeal on their merits, after providing the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard. The Tribunal refrained from expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
Key Issues
Whether there was sufficient cause for condoning the 400-day delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A); Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal *in limine* without considering its merits.
Sections Cited
250, 147, 144, 142(1), 148, 143(2), 69, 249(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR
Before: SH. UDAYAN DASGUPTA & SH. BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH
Per Udayan Dasgupta, J.M.:
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A) National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 25.10.2024 passed u/s 250 of the
Income Tax Act, 1961 which has emanated from the order of the AO, NFAC dated 27.03.2022 passed u/s 147 (r.w.s 144 of the I.T. Act, 1961).
2 I.T.A. No. 631/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2015-16 2. Grounds of appeal taken by the assessee in Form No. 36 are as follows:
“Ground 1: That the Learned CIT(A) has erred in Law and on facts of the case in dismissing the appeal even though complete justification of the late filing by 400 days was properly mentioned and prayed for in Form 35.
Ground 2: That the Learned Assessing Officer has erred in Law and on facts of the case in dismissing the appeal without taking cognizance of the circumstances for delay in filing the appeal and ignoring the Principles of Natural Justice.
Ground 3: The Learned Assessing Officer erred in making the addition of Rs 90,98,58/ without basis.
Ground 4: The Assessee craves to add, alter, delete any ground of appeal before or at the time of hearing of appeal.”
The brief facts of the case are that the Assessing Officer, on the basis of
information that the assessee has indulged in financial transaction amounting to
Rs.90.98 lacs and has earned interests amounting to Rs. 30.32 lacs, coupled with the
fact that no return is filed, and the assessee has also not responded to various notices
issued u/s 142(1) of the Act, proceedings were initiated u/s 148 as per provisions of
law. Subsequently, return was filed by the assessee u/s 148 and e-verified and notice
u/s 143(2) issued, with recorded reasons. Explanation put forth by the assessee has
been considered and the assessment was completed on a total income of
Rs.1,21,30,691/- (with an addition of Rs.90.98 lacs u/s 69.)
3 I.T.A. No. 631/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2015-16 4. The matter was carried in appeal before the ld. first appellate authority but the
said appeal has been dismissed by the ld. first appellate authority without admitting
the appeal and without considerations of any grounds of appeal on merits of the case.
The appeal before the ld. first appellate authority was filed belatedly by 400
days (four hundred days) and the explanations submitted by the assessee was not
found to be satisfactory, resulting in dismissing the appeal with the following
observations:
“In the instance case, the appellant has not shown any sufficient cause. The reasons cited by the appellant are not found tenable and thus the prayer for condonation of delay file by the appellant is not admissible. The appeal is therefore dismissed in limine under the provision of Sec. 249(3) r.w.s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Since, the appellant has not adduced any additional ground(s) and since no ground of appeal has been altered/modified/changed, this ground of appeal is dismissed as “not pressed”.
Now, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal on the grounds contained in
the memorandum of appeal. In course of hearing, the assessee has filed an affidavit
explaining the delay of 400 days (four hundred) in filing the appeal before the ld. first
appellate authority. The ld. AR submitted that the assessee has received the
assessment order on 27.03.2022, the appeal against which should have been filed
within 30 days thereafter. He further submitted that the assessee is suffering from
4 I.T.A. No. 631/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2015-16 Brest cancer and was under continuous medical treatment at VMMC, Safdarganj, Hospital, New Delhi and was admitted for surgery on 21st March, 2022.
Further medical papers were also filed relating to her physical health
conditions issued by VMMC, which relates to the period March, 2022, date of
admission in hospital being 21.03.2022, followed by surgery. Subsequently,
treatment was ongoing at Medanta till Nov., 2023, at periodical interval. The ld. AR
submits, that because of extreme negative health conditions, the assessee could not
file the appeal within the time because she was already in hospital when the
assessment order was passed and moreover, since it is a case for medical oncology,
repeated medical checkups, investigation and various procedures were required.
Subsequently, the assessee managed to contact his counsel and with his help,
has filed the appeal before the first appellate authority on 13.06.2023 which is
belated by 400 days. He further prayed that considering the medical conditions of the
assessee herself which are all supported by medical certificate of various hospitals,
the delay in filing the appeal before the first appellate authority may please be
condoned and the appeal may please be admitted to be heard on merits.
As such, considering the submissions and the facts of the case and the
materials on record, we find that the assessee was suffering from cancer and had to
5 I.T.A. No. 631/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2015-16 undergo surgery and was prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal within
time.
Considering the factual aspect of the matter, and in the interest of justice, we
consider it fit and proper to remand the matter back to the files of the ld. first
appellate authority to admit the appeal and to consider and decide all the grounds of
appeal contained in the memorandum of appeal on merits of the case.
The assessee will be allowed reasonable opportunity of being heard.
We have not expressed any opinion on merits.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in open court as on 27.05.2025.
Sd/- Sd/- (Brajesh Kumar Singh) (Udayan Dasgupta) Accountant Member Judicial Member *GP/Sr.PS* Copy of the order forwarded to: (1)The Appellant: (2) The Respondent: (3) The CIT concerned (4) The Sr. DR, I.T.A.T True Copy By Order
