SHRI SIMERDEEP SINGH,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal held that the agreement for Rs.155 Lacs was a 'dumb document' without corroborative evidence, and directed the AO to adopt the actual sale consideration of Rs.90 Lacs. For carry forward of capital losses, citing Special Bench and High Court decisions, the tribunal ruled that claims made in returns filed in response to a Section 153A notice within the allowed time, in abated assessments, must be allowed.
What were the facts?
The assessee, following a search u/s 132 and notice u/s 153A, re-computed a long-term capital loss. An original agreement for sale of a plot for Rs.155 Lacs was seized, but the buyer denied it, stating the actual purchase was Rs.90 Lacs via registered deed. The assessee claimed the Rs.155 Lacs agreement was fabricated to inflate property value for bank loans. The AO and CIT(A) adopted Rs.155 Lacs as sale consideration and denied carry forward of capital loss due to belated original return.
What were the issues?
Whether the actual sale consideration for capital gains computation should be based on a seized inflated agreement or the registered sale deed; and whether long-term capital losses can be carried forward when the original return was belated but a revised return in response to a Section 153A notice was filed within time.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 139,Section 132,Section 153A,Section 132(4A),Section 139(1),Section 139(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘DB’, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM & HON’BLE SHRI UDAYAN DAS GUPTA, JM
आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत /Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 2. ��थ�/Respondent 3. आयकरआयु�/CIT 4. िवभागीय�ितिनिध/DR 5. गाड�फाईल/GF
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITAT AMRITSAR
More judgments on Section 139
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shamsunder Pritesh Malode, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-12(1), HyderabadITA 399/HYD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Radhakishan Potharajula, Karim Nagar vs ITO (Int Taxn)-2, HyderabadITA 2340/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026