TEJPAL,FARIDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, FARIDABAD
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to verify the validity of the ITR filed by the assessee from the department's records. Upon verification, the CIT(A) is to admit the appeal and adjudicate the grounds after providing an opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) dated 14.09.2023. The CIT(A) had not admitted this appeal, invoking Section 249(4)(b) of the Income Tax Act, despite the assessee's counsel submitting a copy of the ITR filed on 05.12.2019.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in not admitting the appeal under Section 249(4)(b) without verifying the ITR filing, and whether the appeal should be admitted for adjudication.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘H’, NEW DELHI
Before: Dr. B. R. R. KumarMs. Astha Chandra
Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member:
The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 14.09.2023. 2. The appeal of the assessee has not been admitted by the ld. CIT(A) invoking the provisions of Section 249(4)(b), while the ld. Counsel of the assessee filed copy of the ITR filed by the assessee on 05.12.2019. The ld. CIT(A) shall go through this fact and verify from the records of the department about the validity of the return filed, then admit the appeal and to adjudicate the grounds after affording an opportunity of being heard to the assessee. 2 Tejpal
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 15/02/2024. (Ashta Chandra) (Dr. B. R. R. Kumar) Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated: 15/02/2024 *Subodh Kumar, Sr. PS*
More judgments on Section 249(4)(b)
- Babu Gundlapalle, Chittoor vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, ChittoorITA 2093/HYD/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Satnam Singh, Tarn Taran vs Income Tax Officer Ward -1, Tarn TaranITA 958/ASR/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2017-2018
- Late Shri Shreeram Rekhai Prasad Singh… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 41(3)(4), MumbaiITA 4518/MUM/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Inderpreet Singh, Payal, Ludhiana vs ITO-Ward 1, KhannaITA 983/CHANDI/2026[2018-2019]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2018-2019
- Inderpreet Singh, Ludhiana vs ITO-Ward 1, KhannaITA 982/CHANDI/2026[2018-2019]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2018-2019
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026