HTL LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the original order under section 263, which formed the basis of the CIT(A) order, had already been quashed by the Tribunal in an earlier case (ITA No.4651/Del/2019, dated 06.07.2022). Consequently, the consequential CIT(A) order did not survive. Therefore, the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-29 for Assessment Year 2014-15. The CIT(A) order was consequential to an order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
Whether a CIT(A) order, which is consequential to a Section 263 order, survives when the original Section 263 order has been quashed by the Tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH, ‘B’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA & SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD
ORDER PER SHAMIM YAHYA, AM,
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-29, New Delhi, dated 19.10.2023 pertaining to Assessment Year 2014-15.
At the outset, in this case, it is noted that the ld. CIT(A) order is consequential to the order u/s 263 of the Act. It is noted that the said order u/s 263 has been quashed by the Tribunal in vide order dated 06.07.2022. In view of the matter, this consequential order of the Ld. CIT(A) does not survive, hence, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 27th February, 2024.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026