VANVASI KALYAN ASHRAM PUNJAB,LUDHIANA vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), JALANDHAR
Facts
The assessee, a charitable society provisionally registered u/s 12A, applied for final registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT(E) rejected the application, observing that no independent charitable activity was carried out, funds were transferred to other units, and proper documentary evidences like bills and vouchers were not submitted.
Held
The Tribunal noted that the CIT(E) rejected the application without issuing a show-cause notice or providing the assessee an opportunity to be heard. Therefore, the Tribunal remanded the matter back to the CIT(E) for fresh consideration, directing the assessee to file all necessary documents and cooperate.
Key Issues
Whether the rejection of the application for registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) by the CIT(E) without providing a show-cause notice and opportunity to be heard was valid.
Sections Cited
12A(1)(ac)(iii), 12AB, Rule 34(4) of Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR
Before: SH. MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL & SH. UDAYAN DASGUPTA
Per Udayan Dasgupta, J.M.:
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT (Exemptions), Chandigarh dated 19.11.2024 rejecting the application for registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act filed on 14.06.2024.
Grounds of appeal taken by the assessee in Form No. 36 are as follows:
2 I.T.A. No.49/Asr/2025 Assessment Year: NA “1. That the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax 1 (Exemptions), Chandigarh is bad in law and against facts and circumstances of the case.
That order u/s 12AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is against law and facts on the file in as much as the rejection of application for registration is without any valid reason and is on the basis of wrong interpretation of law.
That order u/s 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 rejecting the application for Registration was passed by the Learned 3 Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh without proper opportunity and without giving any show- cause notice to the appellant.
The appellant craves leave to add, amend or delete any of the ground(s) of appeal before it is finally heard.”
Brief facts emerging from the record are that the assessee is a charitable
society and registered before the Registrar of Firms and Societies under the
‘Societies Registration Act of 1860 (as amended) and is provisionally registered u/s
12A, vide order dated 01.10.2024 valid from assessment years 2022-23 to 2024-25,
and has filed for final registration on 14.06.2024 u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act, 1961.
During the course of registration, several notices were issued by the ld. CIT(E)
raising enquiries on various issues in response to which the applicant as submitted its
reply on 12.11.2024 and on a perusal of the documents submitted it has been
observed by the ld. CIT(E) that the funds has been transferred from the assessee’s
office in Punjab to assessee’s office at Bombay and Jaspur amounting to Rs.32 (thirty
two) lacs which, persuaded the ld. CIT(E) to a conclusion that no independent
3 I.T.A. No.49/Asr/2025 Assessment Year: NA charitable activity is carried out by the assessee as per its memorandum of
association, and he also observed that no documentary evidences such as bills and
vouchers has been filed in relation to its claim of any charitable activities.
As such, the ld. CIT(E) arrived at a conclusion that the society is not
performing its activities as per objects contained in the memorandum of association
and as such, the application filed by the assessee in Form No. 10AB has been
rejected.
The ld. AR submitted that all papers and documents as required for the purpose
of registration of the society has been filed along with the application and other
queries as asked by the registration granting authority has been submitted in the
online portal, along with all necessary documentary evidences and all requirements
of the notices has been met. However, the ld. CIT(E) before rejection, has not issued
any show cause notice, or issued an opportunity of explaining the matter before
rejection. He further submitted that the rejection has been made on the grounds that
independent charitable activity of the society is not being carried out as per the
objects contained in the MoA and has simply rejected the application because of the
reason that funds has been transferred from the unit at Ludhiana, (Punjab) to the unit
at Mumbai which however does not violate any provisions of the Act. The objects of
the society are charitable in nature and there is no deficiency or defect pointed out at
4 I.T.A. No.49/Asr/2025 Assessment Year: NA any stage by virtue of which a violation can be recorded which may entitle the
disallowance of registration.
As such, he prays that since the entire rejection has been done without any
opportunity to show cause and to rebut the findings of the ld. CIT(E), he prays that an
opportunity may please be allowed to explain the case before the ld. CIT(E) and
requested for remanding the matter back to the ld. CIT(E) for considering the
registration application afresh as per provisions of law.
The ld. DR relied on the order of the ld. CIT(E) but could not point out any
technical lacunae or any violation of any provisions of the Act and has no objection if
the matter is remanded back to the files of the ld. CIT(E) for fresh consideration.
We have heard the rival submissions and considered the materials on record
and we find that in the instant case, the ld. CIT(E) has rejected the application on the
ground that no independent charitable activity has been done by the society as per its
MoA and it has transferred funds from its unit at Punjab to its Bombay and Jaspur
office. Moreover, it is also observed that the proper bills and vouchers as requested
by the ld. CIT(E) has not been produced.
As such, in the interest of justice, we remand the matter back to the files of the
ld. CIT(E) to consider the application for registration afresh, considering the fact that
5 I.T.A. No.49/Asr/2025 Assessment Year: NA no show cause notice has been issued and the assessee never had the opportunity to
rebut the findings of the ld. CIT(E).
The assessee is also directed to file all necessary documentary evidences and
explanations before the ld. CIT (E) and to fully cooperate in the registration
proceedings. The assessee to be allowed proper opportunity of being heard.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in accordance with Rule 34(4) of the Income Tax (Appellate
Tribunal) Rules, 1963 as on 21.07.2025
Sd/- Sd/- (Manoj Kumar Aggarwal) (Udayan Dasgupta) Accountant Member Judicial Member *GP/Sr.PS* Copy of the order forwarded to: (1)The Appellant: (2) The Respondent: (3) The CIT concerned (4) The Sr. DR, I.T.A.T True Copy By Order
