SANGAT SINGH,ABOHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3), ABOHAR, ABOHAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal after confirming the submission of a certificate under section 92(1) of Finance Act (No. 2) 2024 and noting that the Ld. DR had no objection. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against a CIT(A) order for A.Y. 2012-13, which originated from an ITO order under sections 143(3)/147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee subsequently requested to withdraw the appeal, having opted for settlement under the "Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2024".
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal should be allowed to be withdrawn by the assessee following an application for settlement under the "Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2024".
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR.
Before: SH. MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL & SH. UDAYAN DAS GUPTA
ORDER Per: Udayan Das Gupta, JM This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi, passed u/s 250 of the Act, 1961, dated 20.03.2024 for A.Y. 2012-13 which has emanated from the order of the ITO, Ward 2(3), Abohar, dated 28.12.2019 passed u/s 143(3)/147 of the Act 1961.
The above assessee has filed written request for withdrawal of the respective appeal due to the reasons that he has filed application under “Direct Tax Vivad Se 2 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Vishwas Scheme-2024”, for settlement of disputes relating to tax arrears, in respect of the assessment year stated above.
Documentary evidence in Form-2 (rule-5) being the certificate under section 92(1) of Finance Act (No. 2) 2024 is also enclosed.
The Ld. DR has no objection.
In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of this appeal.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 21.07.2025 under Rule 34(4) of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules 1963.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026