M/S. ZODIAC VINTRADE PVT. LTD.,(NOW AMALGAMATED WITH NIGHTANGLE TRADECOM (P) LTD.,),KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 10(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee did not want to proceed with the appeal and had requested to withdraw it. The Tribunal accordingly dismissed the appeal as not pressed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT against a revision order passed by the Pr. CIT. During the hearing, the assessee's authorized representative stated that the assessee no longer wished to pursue the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee wished to withdraw its appeal before the Tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH: KOLKATA
ORDER Per Shri A.T.Varkey, JM This appeal preferred by the assessee is against the revision order of the Pr. CIT, Kolkata-4, Kolkata passed u/s. 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 dated 05.03.2018 for AY 2012-13.
At the time of hearing, the Ld. AR submitted that the assessee has instructed vide letter dated 25.10.2018 that it does not want to proceed with the above appeal. Hence, the Ld. AR wants to withdraw the appeal. Ld. DR has not objected to this prayer of the assessee’s Ld. AR. Hence, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee being not pressed 3. In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed being not pressed. Order is pronounced in the open court on 13/11/2018 Sd/- Sd/- (J. Sudhakar Reddy) (A. T. Varkey) Accountant Member Judicial Member
Dated: 13th November, 2018 Jd.(Sr.P.S.)
Zodiac Vintrade Pvt. Ltd., AY 2012-13 Copy of the order forwarded to:
1 Appellant – M/s. Zodiac Vintrade Pvt. Ltd. (now amalgamated with Nightangle Tradecom Pvt. Ltd.) 8E, Dacres Lane, 2nd floor, Kolkata-700 069. 2 Respondent – ITO, Ward-10(4), Kolkata. 3 CIT , Kolkata DR, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata (sent through e-mail) 4
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shadab Malik vs. State Of U.P. And 2 OthersAllahabad · 26 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026