M/S. INTERNATIONAL TRACTORS LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT(LTU), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that prior period expenses related to overhead costs for in-house dyes, which were incorrectly capitalized and subsequently reversed, should be allowed as revenue expenditure. It also ruled that high-end vehicles like BMWs and Mercedes qualify as 'light motor vehicles' and are eligible for a higher depreciation rate of 50% if acquired within the specified period.
What were the facts?
The assessee company, engaged in manufacturing tractors, appealed against disallowances of prior period expenses, depreciation on energy-saving devices, and Section 14A additions. The revenue also appealed against deletions made by the CIT(A) concerning prior period expenses, depreciation on UPS, provision for warranty, Section 80JJAA claims, software expenses, depreciation on high-end vehicles, and provision for doubtful debts.
What were the issues?
The key issues involved the allowability of prior period expenses, the correct depreciation rate for certain vehicles, and the disallowance of provisions for doubtful debts.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 14A,Section 36(2),Section 37(1)(vii)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(10)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- Goetze (India) Ltd. v. CIT1,842 citing284 ITR 323 · 2006 · SC
- Jute Corporation of India Ltd. v. CIT1,372 citing187 ITR 688 · 1991 · SC
- Rotork Controls India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT739 citing314 ITR 62 · 2009 · SC
- PCIT v. Era Infrastructure (India) Ltd.354 citing141 Taxmann.com 289 · 2022 · HC
- CIT v. Jai Parabolic Springs Ltd.349 citing306 ITR 42 · 2008 · HC · Read judgment
- Tools Pvt Ltd. v. CIT142 citing238 ITR 268 · 1999 · HC
- International Tractors Ltd. v. DCIT16 citing435 ITR 85 · 2021 · HC · Read judgment
- Oriental Bank of Commerce v. ACIT10 citing93 Taxmann.com 432 · 2018 · HC
- PCIT v. Nestle India ltd.7 citing153 Taxmann.com 201 · 2023
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “G”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY & SHRI M. BALAGANESH
PER M. BALAGANESH, A. M.:
The appeal in ITA No. 3811/Del/2014 filed by the assessee and ITA No. 3663/Del/2014 field by the revenue for AY 2009-10, arises out of the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-LTU, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as „ld. CIT(A)‟, in short] in Appeal No. 33/11-12/CIT(A)-LTU dated 31.03.2014 International Tractors Ltd
against the order of assessment passed u/s 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as „th
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026