DEVENDER KUMAR SACHDEVA,NUH vs. ITO WARD 1(4), GURGAON

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1710/DEL/2023Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 March 2024AY 2010-2011Bench: Sh. Kul Bharat, Judicial Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar (Accountant Member)1 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the appeal was filed beyond the statutory limitation period. As the assessee failed to file any application for condonation of delay, the appeal was dismissed as invalid.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against an order issued by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated December 7, 2022.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal filed by the assessee was barred by limitation and if the absence of a condonation of delay application rendered it invalid.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘B’, NEW DELHI

Before: Sh. Kul BharatDr. B. R. R. Kumar

Hearing: 06.03.2024Pronounced: 08.03.2024

ORDER

Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member:

1.

The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 07.12.2022. 2. On perusal of the record, we find that the appeal filed before the Tribunal is barred by limitation. The assessee has not filed any application for condonation of delay. Hence, the appeal is hereby dismissed as invalid.

3.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 08/03/2024.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →