SATBIR SAGWAL,KARNAL vs. PRCIT, KARNAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Departmental Representative raised no objection to the assessee's request for withdrawal. The tribunal granted permission to the assessee to withdraw the appeal, and as a consequence, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 2011-12. During the hearing, the assessee's counsel informed the tribunal that the assessee no longer wished to pursue the appeal and had filed an application for its withdrawal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's request to withdraw an appeal filed against an order under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act should be permitted.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA
O R D E R PER KUL BHARAT, JM:
This appeal, by the assessee, is directed against the order of the learned Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Karnal, dated 11.02.2016, passed u/s 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the “Act”), pertaining to the assessment year 2011- 12.
At the outset learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee is not interested in pursuing the present appeal and has instructed to withdraw the appeal. Learned counsel, accordingly, prayed for permission to withdraw the present appeal. He has also filed an application dated 21.03.2021 to this effect.
Learned DR raised no objection to the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal. Accordingly, assessee is permitted to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, appeal of the assessee stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in open court on 21.03.2024.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026