SHARP EYE ADVERTISEMENT PVT. LTD.,,DELHI vs. PR,CIT CENTRAL DELHI-3, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1108/DEL/2021Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 April 2024AY 2014-15Bench: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY (Vice President), SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA (Accountant Member)3 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that in light of the NCLT-imposed moratorium under Section 14(1) of the IBC, all ongoing proceedings in any court or tribunal against the assessee cannot continue. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed for statistical purposes, granting parties the opportunity to revive them if the NCLT order is later reversed or modified.

What were the facts?

The assessee, M/s. Sharp Advertisement Pvt. Ltd., challenged four orders passed by the PCIT under section 263 of the Income-tax Act for AYs 2014-15 to 2017-18. Subsequent to filing these appeals, financial creditors initiated Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the assessee under Section 7 of the IBC, which the NCLT admitted on 17.05.2022, thereby imposing a moratorium under Section 14(1) of the IBC.

What were the issues?

Whether income tax appeals can proceed when a moratorium under Section 14(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, has been imposed by the NCLT against the assessee company.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 263

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘H’ NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, VICE- & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA

For Respondent: Ms. Sapna Bhatia, CIT(DR)
Hearing: 09.04.2024Pronounced: 09.04.2024

PER SAKTIJIT DEY, VICE-PRESIDENT

1.

Captioned appeals have been filed by the assessee challenging four separate orders, all dated 24.03.2021, passed by learned Principle Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT), Central, Delhi-3, under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) for the assessment years 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 and 2017-18.

2.

When the appeals were called for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee despite notice. Even, there is no application seeking adjournment.

3.

In view of the aforesaid, we proceed to dispose of the appeals ex-parte qua the assessee after hearing learned Departmental Representative and based on the materials available on record. It is observed, certain financial creditors of the assessee company filed application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) seeking initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the assessee before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), since, the assessee had failed to repay the debt liability. Post filing of the present appeals, the NCLT principal bench, New Delhi, has passed an order on 17.05.2022 admitting the application of the financial creditors and initiating CIRP against the assessee. Further, upon admission of the application of the financial creditors, moratorium under section 14(1) of the IBC has been imposed. A copy of the aforesaid order of learned NCLT is available on record.

4.

Thus, in view of the moratorium granted by NCLT, all proceedings in any court of law, Tribunal etc. cannot continue.

That being the position in law, no useful purpose is going to be served in keeping the appeals pending. Therefore, in our view, these appeals need to be consigned to the records.

5.

In view of the aforesaid, we dismiss these appeals. However, opportunity is granted to the parties to seek revival of the appeals, in case, order of NCLT is either reversed or modified by any higher judicial Authority or if there is any change in factual or legal position or if it is necessary to do so in the interest of the parties.

6.

In the result, appeals are dismissed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 9th April, 2024

More judgments on Section 263

All 13,616 judgments and leading authorities on Section 263 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →