SHARP EYE ADVERTISEMENT PVT. LTD.,,DELHI vs. PR,CIT CENTRAL DELHI-3, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that in light of the NCLT-imposed moratorium under Section 14(1) of the IBC, all ongoing proceedings in any court or tribunal against the assessee cannot continue. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed for statistical purposes, granting parties the opportunity to revive them if the NCLT order is later reversed or modified.
What were the facts?
The assessee, M/s. Sharp Advertisement Pvt. Ltd., challenged four orders passed by the PCIT under section 263 of the Income-tax Act for AYs 2014-15 to 2017-18. Subsequent to filing these appeals, financial creditors initiated Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the assessee under Section 7 of the IBC, which the NCLT admitted on 17.05.2022, thereby imposing a moratorium under Section 14(1) of the IBC.
What were the issues?
Whether income tax appeals can proceed when a moratorium under Section 14(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, has been imposed by the NCLT against the assessee company.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘H’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, VICE- & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA
PER SAKTIJIT DEY, VICE-PRESIDENT
Captioned appeals have been filed by the assessee challenging four separate orders, all dated 24.03.2021, passed by learned Principle Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT), Central, Delhi-3, under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) for the assessment years 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 and 2017-18.
When the appeals were called for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee despite notice. Even, there is no application seeking adjournment.
In view of the aforesaid, we proceed to dispose of the appeals ex-parte qua the assessee after hearing learned Departmental Representative and based on the materials available on record. It is observed, certain financial creditors of the assessee company filed application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) seeking initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the assessee before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), since, the assessee had failed to repay the debt liability. Post filing of the present appeals, the NCLT principal bench, New Delhi, has passed an order on 17.05.2022 admitting the application of the financial creditors and initiating CIRP against the assessee. Further, upon admission of the application of the financial creditors, moratorium under section 14(1) of the IBC has been imposed. A copy of the aforesaid order of learned NCLT is available on record.
Thus, in view of the moratorium granted by NCLT, all proceedings in any court of law, Tribunal etc. cannot continue.
That being the position in law, no useful purpose is going to be served in keeping the appeals pending. Therefore, in our view, these appeals need to be consigned to the records.
In view of the aforesaid, we dismiss these appeals. However, opportunity is granted to the parties to seek revival of the appeals, in case, order of NCLT is either reversed or modified by any higher judicial Authority or if there is any change in factual or legal position or if it is necessary to do so in the interest of the parties.
In the result, appeals are dismissed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 9th April, 2024
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026