JANM FOUNDATION,GURGAON vs. CIT EXEMPTION, CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the 226-day delay in filing appeals, accepting the assessee's explanation regarding improper notice service. It restored both appeals against the rejection orders (u/s 12AB(1)(b) and 80G(5)) to the CIT(E) for de novo adjudication. The assessee was directed to regularly monitor the e-filing portal for notices and cooperate with the CIT(E) for expeditious disposal.
What were the facts?
Janm Foundation, a charitable trust, had its applications for registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) and exemption u/s 80G rejected by the CIT(E) for non-compliance with notices. The assessee contended that notices were not properly served electronically or by post, leading to their inability to respond and a 226-day delay in filing the appeals, for which condonation was sought.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the delay in filing appeals should be condoned. 2. Whether the rejection of registration and exemption applications due to non-compliance with notices was justified given the assessee's claim of improper service.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 12AB(1)(b),Section 80G(5),Section 12A,Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “C”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI M. BALAGANESH & SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S.
O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH, A. M.: These appeals in and 1975/Del/2023 for AYs 2021-22 1. and 2022-23, arise out of the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT(E)’, in short] dated 22.09.2022 for AY 2021-22 and dated 23.09.2022 for AY 2022-23.
At the outset, we find that there is a delay of 226 days in filing of appeals before us by the assessee. The Condonation petition together with an Affidavit has been filed by the assessee explained the reasons for the delay. Considering the explanations given thereon, we are convinced that the assessee was prevented from sufficient cause from filing appeals before us in time. Accordingly, the delay in both the appeals are hereby condoned and appeals of the assessee are admitted for adjudication.
The appeal in is against the rejection order passed by the ld. CIT(Exemptions), Chandigarh u/s 12AB(1)(b) of the Act on 22.9.2022. The appeal in is against the rejection order passed by the ld. CIT(Exemptions), Chandigarh u/s 80G(5) of the Act on 22.9.2022.
We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. 5. The assessee is a public charitable trust undertaking charitable activities around prevalent issues of social development as is evident from its objects. The assessee made an application for seeking provisional registration u/s 12A of the Act which was allowed on 27.5.2021. Thereafter, the assessee filed an application for registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act on 31.3.2022. It is a fact that the ld. CIT(E), Chandigarh had sought for certain details from the assessee during the course of grant of registration of assessee trust. It is a fact that the assessee had not complied to the various notices issued by the ld. CIT(E), Chandigarh. The case of the assessee was that notices were not served by any prescribed method under the Act and the same were simply uploaded on the e-filing portal without any intimation through electronic mode or post to the assessee. No email or SMS was sent to the assessee regarding the same. Accordingly, the assessee could not comply with the notices before the ld. CIT(E) by furnishing the requsite details. The ld. AR before us prayed for one more opportunity to be given to the assessee so that all the requisite details could be furnished by the assessee and the ld. CIT(E) could take a judicious call on the same. When this was put to the ld. DR, no serious objections were raised by him. Since the registration was rejected, consequentially the application seeking exemption u/s 80G of the Act was also rejected by the ld. CIT(E). Hence we deem it fit and appropriate to restore both the appeals to the file of ld. CIT(E), Chandigarh for denovo adjudication in accordance with law. The assessee is directed to kindly look into the e-filing portal on regular basis for any hearing notices issued by the ld. CIT(E) in connection with the impugned application for registration and exemption u/s 80G. The assessee is also directed to co-operate with the ld. CIT(E) for expeditious disposal of the applications by not taking adjournments except due to unavoidable or exceptional circumstances. With these directions, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes. 6. In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 16/04/2024.
More judgments on Section 12AB(1)(b)
- Sat Guru Saran Niwas Trust, Agra vs CIT(Exemption), AgraITA 674/AGR/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Samvedna Foundation Trust, Agra vs ITO, Ward Exemption, AgraITA 496/AGR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- S S Shah P M Jariwala N S Damanwala Surat V… vs CIT(Exemptions), MumbaiITA 8678/MUM/2026[2027 - 28]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026