KARNAIL SINGH UPPAL,PHILLAUR vs. ITO-2, PHAGWARA, PHAGWARA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal, noting that the Ld. DR had no objection. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed as withdrawn. The order was pronounced in accordance with Rule 34(4) of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for Assessment Year 2011-12. Subsequently, the assessee submitted a written request to withdraw the appeal, having applied under the "Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2024" for settlement of tax arrears related to the same assessment year. Documentary evidence in Form-4 (Rule-7) under Section 92(1) of Finance Act (No. 2) 2024 was also enclosed.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal before the ITAT can be withdrawn by the assessee after opting for settlement under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2024.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR
Before: SH. MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL & SH. UDAYAN DASGUPTA
Per Udayan Dasgupta, J.M.:
This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A)
NFAC, Delhi passed u/s 250 of the Act, 1961, the details of which are as follows:
ITA/189/Asr/2024, Asstt. Year: 2011-12 Karnail Singh Uppal: PAN: ACAPU 0820E
2 Assessment Year: 2011-12
The assessee has filed written request for withdrawal of the appeal due to the reasons that they have filed application under “Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-
2024”, for settlement of disputes relating to tax arrears, in respect of the assessment
year stated above.
Documentary evidence in Form-4 (rule-7) being
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026