BALWINDER KAUR,MOGA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, MOGA

Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2019-20 arises out of an order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 05-09-2024 in the matter of an assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s. 147 r.w.s.144B of the Act on 27-02-2024. 2. From the case records, it emerges that the assessee’s case was reopened to examine credit entries in bank account. The Juri ictional Assessing Officer (JAO) issued notice u/s 148A(b) on 07-03-2023 and thereafter, issued notice u/s 148 on 29-03-2023. After considering assessee’s reply, Ld. AO made addition of Rs.5.90 Lacs. Upon further appeal, Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the assessment against which the assessee is in further appeal before us.

The Ld. AR has raised a pertinent legal ground to state that reopening was bad-in-law and in derogation of the provisions of Sec.151A read with CBDT Notification No.18/2022 dated 29-03-2022 which mandate issuance of such notice by Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) only. The Ld. AR asserted that in terms of ratio of various decisions of juri ictional High Court, issuance of notice u/s 148 by Juri ictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) would vitiate the assessment proceedings. The Ld. AR referred to notice issued by Ld. AO u/s 148 on 29-03-2023 which is kept on Page No.58 of the paper-book. The Ld. Sr. DR opposed admission of any such ground at this stage of proceedings.

The undisputed fact that emerges is that notice u/s 148 has been issued on 29-03-2023 by Juri ictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO). This notice, in terms of notification of the Central Government dated 29-03-2022 u/s 151A sub- section (1) and (2) of the Income Tax Act, was required to be issued by FAO. The failure to do so would vitiate the assessment proceedings as per the lead decision of Hon’ble High Court of Punjab & Haryana in the case of Jatinder Singh Bhangu (165 Taxmann.com 115), the substantive portion of which read as under: -

From the perusal of Section 151A, it is quite evident that scheme of faceless assessment is applicable from the stage of show cause notice under Section 148 as well as 148A. Clause 3 (b) of notification dated 29.03.2022 issued under Section 151A clearly provides that scheme would be applicable to notice under Section 148. Even otherwise, it is a settled proposition of law that assessment proceedings commence from the stage of issuance of show cause notice. The object of introduction of faceless assessment would be defeated if show cause notice under Section 148 is issued by Juri ictional Assessing Officer. The respondents are heavily placing reliance upon office memorandum and letter issued by departmental authorities. It is axiomatic in tax jurisprudence that circulars, instructions and letters issued by Board or any other authority cannot override statutory provisions. The circulars are binding upon authorities and Courts are not bound by circulars. The mandate of Section 144B, 151A read with notification dated 29.03.2022 issued thereunder is quite lucid. There is no ambiguity in the language of statutory provisions, thus, office memorandum or any other instruction issued by Board or any other authority cannot be relied upon. Instructions/circulars can supplement but cannot supplant statutory provisions.

In the wake of above discussion and findings, we find it appropriate to subscribe view expressed by Bombay, Telangana and Gauhati High Court. The instant petitions deserve to be allowed and accordingly allowed.

The notices issued by Juri ictional Assessing Officer under Section 148 are hereby quashed with liberty to respondent to proceed in accordance with procedure prescribed by law.

The appeal stand allowed in terms of our above order.

""थ"/Respondent 3. आयकरआयु-/CIT 4. िवभागीय"ितिनिध/DR 5. गाड3फाईल/GF