M/S. R.K. INDUSTRIES,BURDWAN vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - 2, BURDWAN, BURDWAN

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1462/KOL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 November 2018AY 2011-122 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that since the quantum addition related to undisclosed income from FCI was deleted by the Tribunal, the penalty imposed on the same issue was unsustainable and therefore cancelled. The CIT(A)'s order upholding the penalty was set aside.

What were the facts?

The assessee appealed against the CIT(A)'s order upholding disallowance under Section 40A(3) for delayed payment of provident fund and undisclosed income. The Tribunal had previously partly allowed the assessee's appeal regarding the quantum addition.

What were the issues?

Whether penalty under Section 271(1)(c) is sustainable when the underlying addition has been deleted by the Tribunal. The issue of disallowance under Section 40A(3) was also part of the original appeal.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 40A(3),Section 271(1)(c)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH “A”, KOLKATA

Hearing: 06.11.2018Pronounced: 22.11.2018

ORDER

PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER This appeal by the assessee against the order dated 23.05.2018 passed by CIT(A), Burdwan for AY 2011-12.

2.

Heard both parties and perused the material available on record. It is noted from the record that the assessee filed appeal before the Tribunal challenging the action of the CIT(A) in upholding the disallowance u/s 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “Act”) delaying the payment of provident fund and undisclosed income. This Tribunal vide its order dated 24.10.2018 allowed the appeal of the assessee partly. It is observed from the order imposing penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act by the AO, that the penalty proceedings initiated for not disclosing of corresponding income received from Food Corporation of India (in short “FCI”). As discussed above, the said addition was deleted by this Tribunal vide its order dated (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2011-12) 24.10.2018 vide its para 3. Therefore, in our opinion, when the quantum was deleted by this Tribunal and penalty imposed on the same issue does not stand and no order contrary brought on record by the Ld.DR. In such circumstances, in our opinion, the penalty imposed by the AO does not stand for scrutiny. Therefore, the penalty of Rs.60,000/- is cancelled and the order of CIT(A) is set aside. Accordingly, Grounds No.1 & 2 raised by the assessee are allowed.

3.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on 22.11.2018.

More judgments on Section 40A(3)

All 3,278 judgments and leading authorities on Section 40A(3) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →